Influence of diabetes on characteristics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: a report from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF)
Abstract
Background Diabetes, a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), is associated with worse long-term outcomes in patients with HF due to systolic dysfunction. Whether diabetes mellitus (DM) influences characteristics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF has not been well studied.Methods The Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure is a patient registry and performance-improvement program for patients hospitalized with HF that included a prespecified 10% subgroup with 60- to 90-day follow-up data. Data were analyzed as DM compared with no DM. Pearson chi2 test for categorical variables and t test for continuous variables were used, as was a multivariable analysis that included a stepwise Cox proportional hazard model.Results Among 48,612 patients from 259 hospitals, 42% had DM. Heart failure patients with DM tended to be younger, with greater likelihood of ischemic etiology, and higher serum creatinine levels. Heart failure patients with DM received quality care measures to a similar degree, with a few modest exceptions. No differences in in-hospital mortality were observed, but HF patients with DM experienced modestly longer length of stay (5.9 vs 5.5 days for nondiabetic patients; P < .0001). In the 5791 patients in the follow-up cohort, patients with DM (n = 2464) had similar postdischarge mortality but increased all-cause rehospitalization (31.5% vs 28.2% for nondiabetic patients; P = .006). Multivariable analysis showed that DM was not an independent predictor of in-hospital (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.14; P = .99) or follow-up mortality (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.35; P = .48).Conclusions The Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure data reveal a high prevalence of DM in patients hospitalized with HF. Heat failure patients with DM received similar quality of care and experienced similar short-term mortality compared with patients without DM but had higher risk of rehospitalization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the OPTIMIZE-HF, ADHERE and Get With the Guidelines-HF registries in the United States, T2DM was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
“In the OPTIMIZE-HF, ADHERE and Get With the Guidelines-HF registries in the United States, T2DM was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality.82 -85”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (2018) · cites this paper as [82]
There is a suggestion from some cohorts that short-term mortality in HF patients post-discharge may be similar or slightly lower in those with T2DM.
“There is a suggestion from some cohorts 82,87 that short-term mortality in HF patients post-discharge may be similar or slightly lower in those with T2DM.”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (2018) · cites this paper as [82]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Greenberg, B. H., Abraham, W. T., Albert, N. M., Chiswell, K., Clare, R., Stough, W. G., Gheorghiade, M., O'Connor, C. M., Sun, J. L., Yancy, C. W., Young, J. B., & Fonarow, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Baylor University Medical Center (US)
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greenberg, Barry H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277.e1-277.e8
- ISSN
- 0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004365704
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2007-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, heart failure, comorbidities, hospital readmission, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of care, ischemic heart failure, serum creatinine, post-discharge outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Registries, United States, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review