Cited by 204Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

A cardiopulmonary exercise testing score for predicting outcomes in patients with heart failure

Myers, Jonathan, Arena, Ross, Dewey, Frederick, Bensimhon, Daniel, Abella, Joshua, Hsu, Leon, Chase, Paul, Guazzi, Marco +1 more·2008·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) score.Background Cardiopulmonary exercise test responses, including peak VO(2), markers of ventilatory inefficiency (eg, the VE/VCO(2) slope and oxygen uptake efficiency slope [OUES]), and hemodynamic responses, such as heart rate recovery (HRR) and chronotropic incompetence (CRI) are strong predictors of outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is a need for simplified approaches that integrate the additive prognostic information from CPX.Methods At 4 institutions, 710 patients with HF (568 male/142 female, mean age 56 +/- 13 years, resting left ventricular ejection fraction 33 +/- 14%) underwent CPX and were followed for cardiac-related mortality and separately for major cardiac events (death, hospitalization for HF, transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation) for a mean of 29 +/- 25 months. The age-adjusted prognostic power of peak VO(2), VE/VCO(2) slope, OUES (VO(2) = a log(10)VE + b), resting end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (PetCO(2)), HRR, and CRI were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis, optimal cutpoints were determined, the variables were weighted, and a multivariate score was derived.Results There were 175 composite outcomes. The VE/VCO(2) slope (> or =34) was the strongest predictor of risk and was attributed a relative weight of 7, with weighted scores for abnormal HRR (< or =6 beats at 1 minute), OUES (>1.4), PetCO(2) (<33 mm Hg), and peak VO(2) (< or =14 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) having scores of 5, 3, 3, and 2, respectively. Chronotropic incompetence was not a significant predictor and was excluded from the score. A summed score >15 was associated with an annual mortality rate of 27% and a relative risk of 7.6, whereas a score <5 was associated with a mortality rate of 0.4%. The composite score was the most accurate predictor of cardiovascular events among all CPX responses considered (concordance indexes 0.77 for mortality and 0.75 for composite outcome composed of mortality, transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF-related hospitalization). The summed score remained significantly associated with increased risk after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, ejection fraction, and cardiomyopathy type.Conclusion A multivariable score based on readily available CPX responses provides a simple and integrated method that powerfully predicts outcomes in patients with HF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.07.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 204

Authors
Myers, J., Arena, R., Dewey, F., Bensimhon, D., Abella, J., Hsu, L., Chase, P., Guazzi, M., & Peberdy, M. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
1177-1183
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139034829
Cited by
204
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
46.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK6 RX002477)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
heart failure, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, prognostic score, VE/VCO2 slope, oxygen uptake efficiency slope, peak oxygen uptake, heart rate recovery, chronotropic incompetence, end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation, risk stratification, exercise capacity, ventilatory inefficiency, exercise hemodynamics
MeSH terms
Aged, Carbon Dioxide, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Heart-Assist Devices, Hemodynamics, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Prognosis, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Heart Transplantation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Myocardial Ischemia, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review