Cited by 60Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Physical function and independence 1 year after myocardial infarction: Observations from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in recovery from acute Myocardial infarction: Patients' Health status registry

Open access
Dodson, John A., Arnold, Suzanne V., Reid, Kimberly J., Gill, Thomas M., Rich, Michael W., Masoudi, Frederick A., Spertus, John A., Krumholz, Harlan M. +1 more·2012·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may contribute to health status declines including "independence loss" and "physical function decline." Despite the importance of these outcomes for prognosis and quality of life, their incidence and predictors have not been well described.Methods We studied 2,002 patients with AMI enrolled across 24 sites in the TRIUMPH registry who completed assessments of independence and physical function at the time of AMI and 1 year later. Independence was evaluated by the EuroQol-5D (mobility, self-care, and usual activities), and physical function was assessed with the Short Form-12 physical component score. Declines in ≥1 level on EuroQol-5D and >5 points in PCS were considered clinically significant changes. Hierarchical, multivariable, modified Poisson regression models accounting for within-site variability were used to identify predictors of independence loss and physical function decline.Results One-year post AMI, 43.0% of patients experienced health status declines: 12.8% independence loss alone, 15.2% physical function decline alone, and 15.0% both. After adjustment, variables that predicted independence loss included female sex, nonwhite race, unmarried status, uninsured status, end-stage renal disease, and depression. Variables that predicted physical function decline were uninsured status, lack of cardiac rehabilitation referral, and absence of pre-AMI angina. Age was not predictive of either outcome after adjustment.Conclusions >40% of patients experience independence loss or physical function decline 1 year after AMI. These changes are distinct but can occur simultaneously. Although some risk factors are not modifiable, others suggest potential targets for strategies to preserve patients' health status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 60

Authors
Dodson, J. A., Arnold, S. V., Reid, K. J., Gill, T. M., Rich, M. W., Masoudi, F. A., Spertus, J. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Alexander, K. P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Dodson, John A.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
163
Issue
5
Pages
790-796
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017357941
Cited by
60
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG019134, P30AG021342)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL077113)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction, physical function decline, health deterioration, health disparities, predictors of functional decline, uninsured status, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, depression, end-stage renal disease, sex differences, racial disparities
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Depression, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Physical Fitness, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Time Factors, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Poisson Distribution, Coronary Angiography, Survivors, Sickness Impact Profile, Risk Assessment, Translational Research, Biomedical, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review