The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture plays a significant role in the economic sector. The automation in agriculture is the main concern and the emerging subject across the world. The population is increasing tremendously and with this increase the demand of food and employment is also increasing. The traditional methods which were used by the farmers, were not sufficient enough to fulfill these requirements. Thus, new automated methods were introduced. These new methods satisfied the food requirements and also provided employment opportunities to billions of people. Artificial Intelligence in agriculture has brought an agriculture revolution. This technology has protected the crop yield from various factors like the climate changes, population growth, employment issues and the food security problems. This main concern of this paper is to audit the various applications of Artificial intelligence in agriculture such as for irrigation, weeding, spraying with the help of sensors and other means embedded in robots and drones. These technologies saves the excess use of water, pesticides, herbicides, maintains the fertility of the soil, also helps in the efficient use of man power and elevate the productivity and improve the quality. This paper surveys the work of many researchers to get a brief overview about the current implementation of automation in agriculture, the weeding systems through the robots and drones. The various soil water sensing methods are discussed along with two automated weeding techniques. The implementation of drones is discussed, the various methods used by drones for spraying and crop-monitoring is also discussed in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Ahir, K., Govani, K., Gajera, R., & Shah, M. (2020) · Augmented Human Research · doi:10.1007/s41133-019-0025-2 · Cited by 236
Self-citationRetractedMachine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
(2014) · doi:10.1109/iros20755.2014 · Cited by 1,293
A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence
Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P., & Shah, M. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.aiia.2019.05.004 · Cited by 1,005
Self-citationReview on Application of Drone Systems in Precision Agriculture
Mogili, U. R., & Deepak, B. B. V. L. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.063 · Cited by 869
Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review
Slaughter, D. C., Giles, D. K., & Downey, D. (2008) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2007.05.008 · Cited by 843
Toward a Fully Autonomous UAV: Research Platform for Indoor and Outdoor Urban Search and Rescue
Tomic, T., Schmid, K., Lutz, P., Domel, A., Kassecker, M., Mair, E., Grixa, I., Ruess, F., Suppa, M., & Burschka, D. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2206473 · Cited by 814
Non‐chemical weed management in organic farming systems
Bond, W., & Grundy, A. C. (2001) · Weed Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00246.x · Cited by 653
Shah, K., Patel, H., Sanghvi, D., & Shah, M. (2020) · Augmented Human Research · doi:10.1007/s41133-020-00032-0 · Cited by 576
Self-citationHunt, E. R., Cavigelli, M., Daughtry, C. S. T., Mcmurtrey, J. E., & Walthall, C. L. (2005) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-005-2324-5 · Cited by 573
Cited by
The digitization of agricultural industry – a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0
Abbasi, R., Martinez, P., & Ahmad, R. (2022) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100042 · Cited by 531
Mana, A. A., Allouhi, A., Hamrani, A., Rehman, S., el Jamaoui, I., & Jayachandran, K. (2024) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100416 · Cited by 245
A comparative study of deep learning and internet of things for precision agriculture
Saranya, T., Deisy, C., Sridevi, S., & Anbananthen, K. S. M. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106034 · Cited by 232
Manzoor, B., Othman, I., Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., & Wahab, M. (2021) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi4030052 · Cited by 118
AI ethics: Algorithmic determinism or self-determination? The GPDR approach
Milossi, M., Alexandropoulou-Egyptiadou, E., & Psannis, K. E. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3072782 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Talaviya, T., Shah, D., Patel, N., Yagnik, H., & Shah, M.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 58-73
- ISSN
- 2589-7217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3019464069
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 57.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002
- The paper
- Talaviya, T., Shah, D., Patel, N., Yagnik, H., & Shah, M. (2020). Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.