Cited by 994Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTopic ModelingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Pre-trained models: Past, present and future

Open access
Han, Xu, Zhang, Zhengyan, Ding, Ning, Gu, Yuxian, Liu, Xiao, Huo, Yuqi, Qiu, Jiezhong, Yao, Yuan +16 more·2021·AI Open

Abstract

Large-scale pre-trained models (PTMs) such as BERT and GPT have recently achieved great success and become a milestone in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). Owing to sophisticated pre-training objectives and huge model parameters, large-scale PTMs can effectively capture knowledge from massive labeled and unlabeled data. By storing knowledge into huge parameters and fine-tuning on specific tasks, the rich knowledge implicitly encoded in huge parameters can benefit a variety of downstream tasks, which has been extensively demonstrated via experimental verification and empirical analysis. It is now the consensus of the AI community to adopt PTMs as backbone for downstream tasks rather than learning models from scratch. In this paper, we take a deep look into the history of pre-training, especially its special relation with transfer learning and self-supervised learning, to reveal the crucial position of PTMs in the AI development spectrum. Further, we comprehensively review the latest breakthroughs of PTMs. These breakthroughs are driven by the surge of computational power and the increasing availability of data, towards four important directions: designing effective architectures, utilizing rich contexts, improving computational efficiency, and conducting interpretation and theoretical analysis. Finally, we discuss a series of open problems and research directions of PTMs, and hope our view can inspire and advance the future study of PTMs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The utilization of LLMs for training, fine-tuning, and execution necessitates considerable computational resources, posing challenges for companies operating with constrained hardware capabilities.

    “The utilization of LLMs for training, fine-tuning, and execution necessitates considerable computational resources, posing challenges for companies operating with constrained hardware capabilities (Han et al. 2021).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 378 · Cited by 994

Authors
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., Han, W., Huang, M., Jin, Q., Lan, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Lu, Z., Qiu, X., Song, R., Tang, J., Wen, J.-R., Yuan, J., Zhao, W. X., & Zhu, J.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, Xu
Venue
AI Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
2
Pages
225-250
ISSN
2666-6510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198659451
Cited by
994
References
378
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 296 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 13
FWCI
55.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
pre-trained models, transfer learning, self-supervised learning, BERT, GPT, pre-training objectives, model architecture design, computational efficiency, interpretability, theoretical analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review