Pre-trained models: Past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale pre-trained models (PTMs) such as BERT and GPT have recently achieved great success and become a milestone in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). Owing to sophisticated pre-training objectives and huge model parameters, large-scale PTMs can effectively capture knowledge from massive labeled and unlabeled data. By storing knowledge into huge parameters and fine-tuning on specific tasks, the rich knowledge implicitly encoded in huge parameters can benefit a variety of downstream tasks, which has been extensively demonstrated via experimental verification and empirical analysis. It is now the consensus of the AI community to adopt PTMs as backbone for downstream tasks rather than learning models from scratch. In this paper, we take a deep look into the history of pre-training, especially its special relation with transfer learning and self-supervised learning, to reveal the crucial position of PTMs in the AI development spectrum. Further, we comprehensively review the latest breakthroughs of PTMs. These breakthroughs are driven by the surge of computational power and the increasing availability of data, towards four important directions: designing effective architectures, utilizing rich contexts, improving computational efficiency, and conducting interpretation and theoretical analysis. Finally, we discuss a series of open problems and research directions of PTMs, and hope our view can inspire and advance the future study of PTMs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The utilization of LLMs for training, fine-tuning, and execution necessitates considerable computational resources, posing challenges for companies operating with constrained hardware capabilities.
“The utilization of LLMs for training, fine-tuning, and execution necessitates considerable computational resources, posing challenges for companies operating with constrained hardware capabilities (Han et al. 2021).”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Han et al. 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 378 · Cited by 994
- Authors
- Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., Han, W., Huang, M., Jin, Q., Lan, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Lu, Z., Qiu, X., Song, R., Tang, J., Wen, J.-R., Yuan, J., Zhao, W. X., & Zhu, J.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Xu
- ORCID
- Venue
- AI Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 225-250
- ISSN
- 2666-6510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198659451
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 378
- Citations by year
- 2026: 117 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 296 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 13
- FWCI
- 55.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AI Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- pre-trained models, transfer learning, self-supervised learning, BERT, GPT, pre-training objectives, model architecture design, computational efficiency, interpretability, theoretical analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review