A Statistical Method for Predicting Classical HLA Alleles from SNP Data
Open accessAbstract
Genetic variation at classical HLA alleles is a crucial determinant of transplant success and susceptibility to a large number of infectious and autoimmune diseases. However, large-scale studies involving classical type I and type II HLA alleles might be limited by the cost of allele-typing technologies. Although recent studies have shown that some common HLA alleles can be tagged with small numbers of markers, SNP-based tagging does not offer a complete solution to predicting HLA alleles. We have developed a new statistical methodology to use SNP variation within the region to predict alleles at key class I (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C) and class II (HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-DQB1) loci. Our results indicate that a single panel of approximately 100 SNPs typed across the region is sufficient for predicting both rare and common HLA alleles with up to 95% accuracy in both African and non-African populations. Furthermore, we show that HLA alleles can be successfully predicted by using previously genotyped SNPs that are within the MHC and that had not been chosen for their ability to predict HLA alleles, such as those included on genome-wide products. These results indicate that our methodology, combined with an extended database of reference haplotypes, will facilitate large-scale experiments, including disease-association studies and vaccine trials, in which detailed information about HLA type is valuable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compilation of large reference populations with both serological and genotyping data on MHC variation has made imputation of classical alleles possible from standard SNP array data to single amino acid resolution.
“Over the last several years, the compilation of large reference populations with both serological and genotyping data on MHC variation has made imputation of classical alleles possible from standard SNP array data to single amino acid resolution.48, 49”
From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Leslie, S., Donnelly, P., & McVean, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McVean, Gil
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-56
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2253983
- OpenAlex
- W2059251603
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (068545/Z/02), 068545)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- HLA class I, HLA class II, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, single nucleotide polymorphisms, major histocompatibility complex, rare HLA alleles, African populations, transplant success, disease susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Female, Haplotypes, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Male, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review