Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research
Open accessAbstract
Concerns about privacy may deter people from participating in genetic research. Recruitment and retention of biobank participants requires understanding the nature and magnitude of these concerns. Potential participants in a proposed biobank were asked about their willingness to participate, their privacy concerns, informed consent, and data sharing. A representative survey of 4659 U.S. adults was conducted. Ninety percent of respondents would be concerned about privacy, 56% would be concerned about researchers having their information, and 37% would worry that study data could be used against them. However, 60% would participate in the biobank if asked. Nearly half (48%) would prefer to provide consent once for all research approved by an oversight panel, whereas 42% would prefer to provide consent for each project separately. Although 92% would allow academic researchers to use study data, 80% and 75%, respectively, would grant access to government and industry researchers. Concern about privacy was related to lower willingness to participate only when respondents were told that they would receive $50 for participation and would not receive individual research results back. Among respondents who were told that they would receive $200 or individual research results, privacy concerns were not related to willingness. Survey respondents valued both privacy and participation in biomedical research. Despite pervasive privacy concerns, 60% would participate in a biobank. Assuring…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Kaufman et al. national online survey of US adults in 2007-2008, 90% of respondents said they would be somewhat or very concerned about privacy, while 60% said they definitely or probably would be willing to participate.
“Although 90% of respondents said they would be somewhat or very concerned about privacy, 60% said they definitely or probably would be willing to participate.”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [77]
In the Kaufman et al. survey, 48% preferred broad consent, 42% preferred study-specific consent, and 10% preferred categorical consent.
“With regard to consent, 48% said they would prefer to give permission once, at the beginning of the study, for all research approved by an oversight committee. Slightly fewer (42%) said they would prefer to be asked for permission for each research project separately, and only 10% preferred to select categories of research for which they would let their materials be used.”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [77]
In support of proposed regulatory changes, the NPRM cited four articles reporting public opinions about biospecimen research, but these publications do not necessarily suggest consensus.
“In support of proposed regulatory changes, the NPRM cited four articles reporting public opinions about biospecimen research (77, 128, 140, 144). But as summarized below, these publications do not necessarily suggest consensus.”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaufman, David J.
- ORCID
- Kaufman, David J.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 643-654
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2775831
- OpenAlex
- W1968416619
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004206, 1 U01 HG004206-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- biobank research, privacy concerns, genetic research participation, informed consent, broad consent, data sharing, participant recruitment and retention, willingness to participate, public attitudes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Public Opinion, Cohort Studies, Biological Specimen Banks, Privacy, Biomedical Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review