Pooled Association Tests for Rare Variants in Exon-Resequencing Studies
Open accessAbstract
Deep sequencing will soon generate comprehensive sequence information in large disease samples. Although the power to detect association with an individual rare variant is limited, pooling variants by gene or pathway into a composite test provides an alternative strategy for identifying susceptibility genes. We describe a statistical method for detecting association of multiple rare variants in protein-coding genes with a quantitative or dichotomous trait. The approach is based on the regression of phenotypic values on individuals' genotype scores subject to a variable allele-frequency threshold, incorporating computational predictions of the functional effects of missense variants. Statistical significance is assessed by permutation testing with variable thresholds. We used a rigorous population-genetics simulation framework to evaluate the power of the method, and we applied the method to empirical sequencing data from three disease studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Price et al. showed that their method with optimal or variable weighting is more powerful than approaches that consider fixed weights.
“Price et al.35 showed that their method is more powerful than approaches that consider fixed weights.”
From Statistical analysis strategies for association studies involving rare variants (2010) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 755
- Authors
- Price, A. L., Kryukov, G. V., de Bakker, P. I. W., Purcell, S. M., Staples, J., Wei, L.-J., & Sunyaev, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sunyaev, Shamil R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 832-838
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3032073
- OpenAlex
- W2070984858
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 85
- FWCI
- 46.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH084676)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM078598)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- rare variants, genotype score, permutation tests, statistical power, susceptibility genes, quantitative traits, dichotomous traits, population genetics simulation
- MeSH terms
- Exons, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Humans, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Models, Statistical, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review