Cited by 248Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenomics and Rare Diseases

Fragile X and X-Linked Intellectual Disability: Four Decades of Discovery

Open access
Lubs, Herbert A., Stevenson, Roger E., Schwartz, Charles E.·2012·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

X-Linked intellectual disability (XLID) accounts for 5%-10% of intellectual disability in males. Over 150 syndromes, the most common of which is the fragile X syndrome, have been described. A large number of families with nonsyndromal XLID, 95 of which have been regionally mapped, have been described as well. Mutations in 102 X-linked genes have been associated with 81 of these XLID syndromes and with 35 of the regionally mapped families with nonsyndromal XLID. Identification of these genes has enabled considerable reclassification and better understanding of the biological basis of XLID. At the same time, it has improved the clinical diagnosis of XLID and allowed for carrier detection and prevention strategies through gamete donation, prenatal diagnosis, and genetic counseling. Progress in delineating XLID has far outpaced the efforts to understand the genetic basis for autosomal intellectual disability. In large measure, this has been because of the relative ease of identifying families with XLID and finding the responsible mutations, as well as the determined and interactive efforts of a small group of researchers worldwide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic approaches have identified causes for more than 1,000 Mendelian and fewer non-Mendelian forms of neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability, ASD, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.

    “Various genetic approaches have been successful in identifying the causes of more than 1,000 Mendelian, and fewer non-Mendelian, forms of neurodevelopmental disorders: prototypical examples are intellectual disability62–68, autism spectrum disorder (ASD)69–77, epilepsy78,79 and schizophrenia80–82.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 248

Authors
Lubs, H. A., Stevenson, R. E., & Schwartz, C. E.
Affiliations
Greenwood Genetic Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, Roger E.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
579-590
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052827796
Cited by
248
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
X-linked intellectual disability, fragile X syndrome, X-linked genes, X-linked mutations, intellectual disability syndromes, carrier detection, prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, gamete donation, history of research
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Mutation, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Genes, X-Linked

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review