Fragile X and X-Linked Intellectual Disability: Four Decades of Discovery
Open accessAbstract
X-Linked intellectual disability (XLID) accounts for 5%-10% of intellectual disability in males. Over 150 syndromes, the most common of which is the fragile X syndrome, have been described. A large number of families with nonsyndromal XLID, 95 of which have been regionally mapped, have been described as well. Mutations in 102 X-linked genes have been associated with 81 of these XLID syndromes and with 35 of the regionally mapped families with nonsyndromal XLID. Identification of these genes has enabled considerable reclassification and better understanding of the biological basis of XLID. At the same time, it has improved the clinical diagnosis of XLID and allowed for carrier detection and prevention strategies through gamete donation, prenatal diagnosis, and genetic counseling. Progress in delineating XLID has far outpaced the efforts to understand the genetic basis for autosomal intellectual disability. In large measure, this has been because of the relative ease of identifying families with XLID and finding the responsible mutations, as well as the determined and interactive efforts of a small group of researchers worldwide.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genetic approaches have identified causes for more than 1,000 Mendelian and fewer non-Mendelian forms of neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability, ASD, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.
“Various genetic approaches have been successful in identifying the causes of more than 1,000 Mendelian, and fewer non-Mendelian, forms of neurodevelopmental disorders: prototypical examples are intellectual disability62–68, autism spectrum disorder (ASD)69–77, epilepsy78,79 and schizophrenia80–82.”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 248
- Authors
- Lubs, H. A., Stevenson, R. E., & Schwartz, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Greenwood Genetic Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stevenson, Roger E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 579-590
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3322227
- OpenAlex
- W2052827796
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- X-linked intellectual disability, fragile X syndrome, X-linked genes, X-linked mutations, intellectual disability syndromes, carrier detection, prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, gamete donation, history of research
- MeSH terms
- Chromosome Mapping, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Mutation, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Genes, X-Linked
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review