Sherlock: Detecting Gene-Disease Associations by Matching Patterns of Expression QTL and GWAS
Open accessAbstract
Genetic mapping of complex diseases to date depends on variations inside or close to the genes that perturb their activities. A strong body of evidence suggests that changes in gene expression play a key role in complex diseases and that numerous loci perturb gene expression in trans. The information in trans variants, however, has largely been ignored in the current analysis paradigm. Here we present a statistical framework for genetic mapping by utilizing collective information in both cis and trans variants. We reason that for a disease-associated gene, any genetic variation that perturbs its expression is also likely to influence the disease risk. Thus, the expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) of the gene, which constitute a unique "genetic signature," should overlap significantly with the set of loci associated with the disease. We translate this idea into a computational algorithm (named Sherlock) to search for gene-disease associations from GWASs, taking advantage of independent eQTL data. Application of this strategy to Crohn disease and type 2 diabetes predicts a number of genes with possible disease roles, including several predictions supported by solid experimental evidence. Importantly, predicted genes are often implicated by multiple trans eQTL with moderate associations. These genes are far from any GWAS association signals and thus cannot be identified from the GWAS alone. Our approach allows analysis of association data from a new perspective and is applicable to any complex phenotype. It is readily generalizable to molecular traits other than gene expression, such as metabolites, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetic modifications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible to infer genetic signatures (eQTL) or phenotypes based on genotypes when datasets are collected from different subjects.
“In such cases, it is possible to infer genetic signatures (eQTL) or phenotypes based on genotypes [48–50].”
From Multi-omics approaches to disease (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
Sherlock's underlying principle is that genetic-driven expression changes in risk genes should also appear as genetic association of the same SNPs with disease.
“Its underlying principle is that genetic-driven changes in expression levels of risk genes (discovered as eSNPs) should ultimately also manifest as genetic association of those same SNPs with disease (GWAS SNPs).”
From Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
Sherlock identified co-localization of GWAS risk and eQTL association signals for 84 genes in 30 of the 108 loci (adjusted P < 0.05).
“The results suggested that GWAS risk and eQTL association signals co-localized for 84 genes in 30 of these loci (adjusted P < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 6A, Supplementary data file 2).”
From Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- He, X., Fuller, C. K., Song, Y., Meng, Q., Zhang, B., Yang, X., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Hao
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 667-680
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3644637
- OpenAlex
- W2171698295
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM070808, GM61390)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- gene-disease association, expression quantitative trait loci, trans-eQTL, cis-eQTL, gene mapping, complex diseases, Crohn's disease, type 2 diabetes, risk genes
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Crohn Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Models, Genetic, Software, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review