Detecting Identity by Descent and Estimating Genotype Error Rates in Sequence Data
Open accessAbstract
Existing methods for identity by descent (IBD) segment detection were designed for SNP array data, not sequence data. Sequence data have a much higher density of genetic variants and a different allele frequency distribution, and can have higher genotype error rates. Consequently, best practices for IBD detection in SNP array data do not necessarily carry over to sequence data. We present a method, IBDseq, for detecting IBD segments in sequence data and a method, SEQERR, for estimating genotype error rates at low-frequency variants by using detected IBD. The IBDseq method estimates probabilities of genotypes observed with error for each pair of individuals under IBD and non-IBD models. The ratio of estimated probabilities under the two models gives a LOD score for IBD. We evaluate several IBD detection methods that are fast enough for application to sequence data (IBDseq, Beagle Refined IBD, PLINK, and GERMLINE) under multiple parameter settings, and we show that IBDseq achieves high power and accuracy for IBD detection in sequence data. The SEQERR method estimates genotype error rates by comparing observed and expected rates of pairs of homozygote and heterozygote genotypes at low-frequency variants in IBD segments. We demonstrate the accuracy of SEQERR in simulated data, and we apply the method to estimate genotype error rates in sequence data from the UK10K and 1000 Genomes projects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 187
- Authors
- Browning, B. L., & Browning, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Browning, Brian L.
- Browning, Sharon R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 840-851
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3824133
- OpenAlex
- W1996723946
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (085475, WT091310, 076113)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG005701, R01HG005701, R01HG004960, HG004960)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 099568, P01GM099568, GM 075091, R01GM075091)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- identity by descent, sequence data, low-frequency variants, lod score, homozygosity, heterozygosity, 1000 Genomes Project
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Europe, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Lod Score, Models, Genetic, Probability, Software, Cohort Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review