Cited by 187Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Detecting Identity by Descent and Estimating Genotype Error Rates in Sequence Data

Open access
Browning, Brian L., Browning, Sharon R.·2013·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Existing methods for identity by descent (IBD) segment detection were designed for SNP array data, not sequence data. Sequence data have a much higher density of genetic variants and a different allele frequency distribution, and can have higher genotype error rates. Consequently, best practices for IBD detection in SNP array data do not necessarily carry over to sequence data. We present a method, IBDseq, for detecting IBD segments in sequence data and a method, SEQERR, for estimating genotype error rates at low-frequency variants by using detected IBD. The IBDseq method estimates probabilities of genotypes observed with error for each pair of individuals under IBD and non-IBD models. The ratio of estimated probabilities under the two models gives a LOD score for IBD. We evaluate several IBD detection methods that are fast enough for application to sequence data (IBDseq, Beagle Refined IBD, PLINK, and GERMLINE) under multiple parameter settings, and we show that IBDseq achieves high power and accuracy for IBD detection in sequence data. The SEQERR method estimates genotype error rates by comparing observed and expected rates of pairs of homozygote and heterozygote genotypes at low-frequency variants in IBD segments. We demonstrate the accuracy of SEQERR in simulated data, and we apply the method to estimate genotype error rates in sequence data from the UK10K and 1000 Genomes projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.09.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 187

Authors
Browning, B. L., & Browning, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Browning, Brian L.
  • Browning, Sharon R.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
840-851
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996723946
Cited by
187
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (085475, WT091310, 076113)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG005701, R01HG005701, R01HG004960, HG004960)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 099568, P01GM099568, GM 075091, R01GM075091)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
identity by descent, sequence data, low-frequency variants, lod score, homozygosity, heterozygosity, 1000 Genomes Project
MeSH terms
Alleles, Europe, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Lod Score, Models, Genetic, Probability, Software, Cohort Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review