Cited by 33Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genetic architecture of gene regulation in Indonesian populations identifies QTLs associated with global and local ancestries

Open access
Natri, Heini M., Hudjashov, Georgi, Jacobs, Guy, Kusuma, Pradiptajati, Saag, Lauri, Darusallam, Chelzie Crenna, Metspalu, Mait, Sudoyo, Herawati +3 more·2022·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Lack of diversity in human genomics limits our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of complex traits, hinders precision medicine, and contributes to health disparities. To map genetic effects on gene regulation in the underrepresented Indonesian population, we have integrated genotype, gene expression, and CpG methylation data from 115 participants across three island populations that capture the major sources of genomic diversity in the region. In a comparison with European datasets, we identify eQTLs shared between Indonesia and Europe as well as population-specific eQTLs that exhibit differences in allele frequencies and/or overall expression levels between populations. By combining local ancestry and archaic introgression inference with eQTLs and methylQTLs, we identify regulatory loci driven by modern Papuan ancestry as well as introgressed Denisovan and Neanderthal variation. GWAS colocalization connects QTLs detected here to hematological traits, and further comparison with European datasets reflects the poor overall transferability of GWAS statistics across diverse populations. Our findings illustrate how population-specific genetic architecture, local ancestry, and archaic introgression drive variation in gene regulation across genetically distinct and in admixed populations and highlight the need for performing association studies on non-European populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown that while polygenic risk scores and eQTLs have limited cross-population portability, biochemically active functional regulatory elements tend to be under evolutionary constraint within the human lineage.

    “Previous studies have shown that, while polygenic risk scores [65] and eQTLs [66] have limited cross-population portability, biochemically active functional regulatory elements tend to be under evolutionary constraint within the human lineage [67, 68].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 33

Authors
Natri, H. M., Hudjashov, G., Jacobs, G., Kusuma, P., Saag, L., Darusallam, C. C., Metspalu, M., Sudoyo, H., Cox, M. P., Gallego Romero, I., & Banovich, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology (ID)
Corresponding author
Banovich, Nicholas E.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
50-65
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200423395
Cited by
33
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund (17-MAU-040)
  • Horizon 2020 European Innovation Council Fast Track to Innovation (810645)
  • European Regional Development Fund (2014-2020.4.01.15-0012)
  • Eesti Teadusagentuur (PUT ( PRG243)
  • Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
  • Horizon 2020
  • Prevent Cancer Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
gene expression regulation, expression quantitative trait loci, local ancestry, archaic introgression, Denisovan introgression, Neanderthal introgression, Indonesian population, hematological traits, underrepresented groups, allele frequency differences, gene expression, CpG methylation
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetics, Population, Humans, Indonesia, Male, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, DNA Methylation, Computational Biology, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Multifactorial Inheritance, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Molecular Sequence Annotation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review