A minimal role for synonymous variation in human disease
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Synonymous mutations change the DNA sequence of a gene without affecting the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. Although some synonymous mutations can affect RNA splicing, translational efficiency, and mRNA stability, studies in human genetics, mutagenesis screens, and other experiments and evolutionary analyses have repeatedly shown that most synonymous variants are neutral or only weakly deleterious, with some notable exceptions. Based on a recent study in yeast, there have been claims that synonymous mutations could be as important as nonsynonymous mutations in causing disease, assuming the yeast findings hold up and translate to humans. Here, we argue that there is insufficient evidence to overturn the large, coherent body of knowledge establishing the predominant neutrality of synonymous variants in the human genome.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were only three significant gene-level cis-CDS pQTLs in the synonymous collapsing model.
“Moreover, there were only three significant gene-level cis-CDS pQTLs in the synonymous (syn) collapsing model19,20 (full definitions of collapsing models can be found in Extended Data Table 1).”
From Rare variant associations with plasma protein levels in the UK Biobank (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The Methods section describes a synonymous-variant gene-based collapsing model, supporting the model cited in the sentence. But the reported results concern UK Biobank clinical phenotypes, not cis-CDS pQTLs; the paper does not support the count of three significant pQTLs. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay
Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.91 · Cited by 825 · see citing works
The sequences of 150,119 genomes in the UK Biobank
Halldorsson, B. V., Eggertsson, H. P., Moore, K. H. S., Hauswedell, H., Eiriksson, O., Ulfarsson, M. O., Palsson, G., Hardarson, M. T., Oddsson, A., Jensson, B. O., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04965-x · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. Shen, X., Song, S., Li, C. & Zhang, J. Synonymous mutations in representative yeast genes are mostly strongly non-neutral. Nature 1–7 (2022) doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04823-w. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rare variant associations with plasma protein levels in the UK Biobank
Dhindsa, R. S., Burren, O. S., Sun, B. B., Prins, B. P., Matelska, D., Wheeler, E., Mitchell, J., Oerton, E., Hristova, V. A., Smith, K. R., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06547-x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dhindsa, R. S., Wang, Q., Vitsios, D., Burren, O. S., Hu, F., DiCarlo, J. E., Kruglyak, L., MacArthur, D. G., Hurles, M. E., & Petrovski, S.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dhindsa, Ryan S.
- Petrovski, Slavé
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2105-2109
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9808499
- OpenAlex
- W4310783369
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32 NS127854)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- synonymous mutations, human disease, deleterious mutations, RNA splicing, translation efficiency, mRNA stability, non-synonymous mutations
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Biological Evolution, Humans, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genome, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review