The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic
Open accessAbstract
Background The community plays an important role in controlling influenza A/H1N1. There is a dearth of data investigating adoption of preventive behaviors in the initial phase of the A/H1N1 pandemic. Methods Three round of random, population-based, anonymous telephone survey were conducted in Hong Kong during the pre-community outbreak phase (May 7 to June 6, 2009) of the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong (n = 999). Results Respectively, 46.65%, 88.75%, and 21.5% washed hands more than 10 times/day, wore face masks when having influenza-like illness (ILI), and wore face masks regularly in public areas. Perceptions related to bodily damages, efficacy of frequent handwashing, nonavailability of effective vaccines, high chance of having a large scale local outbreak, and mental distress because of influenza A/H1N1 were associated with frequent handwashing (odds ratio [OR], 1.46 to 2.15). Perceived vaccine availability was associated with face mask use when having ILI (OR, 1.60). Perceived fatality, efficacy of wearing face masks, and mental distress because of influenza A/H1N1 were associated with face mask use in public areas (OR, 1.53 to 2.52). Conclusion Preventive behaviors were prevalently adopted by the public and were associated with cognitive and affective factors. Prevention efforts should take public perceptions into account, and emerging infectious diseases provide good chances for promoting hygiene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rubin, G. J., Amlot, R., Page, L., & Wessely, S. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2651 · Cited by 1,106 · cited 5×
“1% in the United Kingdom.(10) The UK study documented that the perceived efficacy of preventive measures and the perceived risk of contracting the disease were associated with adoption of recommended preventive behaviors.”
InfluentialCowling, B. J., Fung, R. O. P., Cheng, C. K. Y., Fang, V. J., Chan, K. H., Seto, W. H., Yung, R., Chiu, B., Lee, P., Uyeki, T. M., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002101 · Cited by 186
Cited by
COVID-19 Information Seeking on Digital Media and Preventive Behaviors: The Mediation Role of Worry
Liu, P. L. (2020) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0250 · Cited by 298
Ibuka, Y., Chapman, G. B., Meyers, L. A., Li, M., & Galvani, A. P. (2010) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-296 · Cited by 284
Seale, H., Heywood, A. E., Leask, J., Sheel, M., Thomas, S., Durrheim, D. N., Bolsewicz, K., & Kaur, R. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235112 · Cited by 281
Commentary: Physiological and Psychological Impact of Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Scheid, J. L., Lupien, S. P., Ford, G. S., & West, S. L. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186655 · Cited by 259
Yeung, N. C. Y., Lau, J. T. F., Choi, K. C., & Griffiths, S. (2017) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2305.160768 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, J. T. F., Griffiths, S., Choi, K.-C., & Lin, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Infection Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 374-380
- ISSN
- 0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140770635
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.002
- The paper
- Lau, J. T. F., Griffiths, S., Choi, K.-C., & Lin, C. (2010). Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.