Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Dermatological diseases and infestationsInfection Control in HealthcareDermatology and Skin Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of a family outbreak of scabies with high risk of spread to other community and hospital facilities.

Marotta, Manfredo, Toni, Francesco, Dallolio, Laura, Toni, Greta, Leoni, Erica·2018·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

Background In developed countries, scabies is observed sporadically or as institutional outbreaks in hospitals and other health facilities. In the family context, outbreaks generally involve a limited number of cases.Methods A local health authority in Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy) carried out an epidemiologic investigation on a family outbreak of scabies that included an unusually high number of cases. Its possible connection with a nosocomial case in a long-term care facility (LTCF) and outbreak management are discussed.Results Among the household members, 8 confirmed cases occurred (attack rate, 87.5%). Another case was reported in a patient of an LTCF where one of the family cases worked as a sociosanitary operator. In total, 244 contacts were placed under surveillance. The control strategy focused on a mass information campaign addressed to all contacts and the training of health care personnel. In addition, specific prophylaxis (permethrin 5%) was performed in 108 high-risk contacts and LTCF patients and staff.Conclusions The control measures were successful in preventing the spread of the outbreak. However, misdiagnosis and the tendency of people to hide the symptoms caused the late recognition and underestimation of the cases, contributing to delayed control measures and increasing the economic and human resources required for outbreak management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.12.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Johnstone, 2014, Scabies, BMJ Clin Evid

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marotta, M., Toni, F., Dallolio, L., Toni, G., & Leoni, E.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Rimini (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Dallolio, Laura
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
808-813
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792322284
Cited by
20
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
scabies, Sarcoptes scabiei, family outbreak, nosocomial transmission, long-term care facilities, epidemic control, contact tracing, healthcare staff training, misdiagnosis, Emilia-Romagna
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Child, Preschool, Cross Infection, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Health Facilities, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sarcoptes scabiei, Scabies, Infection Control, Permethrin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.