Cited by 230Social Media in Health EducationPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationData-Driven Disease Surveillance

Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: a systematic review of literature.

Open access
Tang, Lu, Bie, Bijie, Park, Sung-Eun, Zhi, Degui·2018·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

Background The public often turn to social media for information during emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) outbreaks. This study identified the major approaches and assessed the rigors in published research articles on EIDs and social media.Methods We searched 5 databases for published journal articles on EIDs and social media. We then evaluated these articles in terms of EIDs studied, social media examined, theoretical frameworks, methodologic approaches, and research findings.Results Thirty articles were included in the analysis (published between January 1, 2010, and March 1, 2016). EIDs that received most scholarly attention were H1N1 (or swine flu, n = 15), Ebola virus (n = 10), and H7N9 (or avian flu/bird flu, n = 2). Twitter was the most often studied social media (n = 17), followed by YouTube (n = 6), Facebook (n = 6), and blogs (n = 6). Three major approaches in this area of inquiry are identified: (1) assessment of the public's interest in and responses to EIDs, (2) examination of organizations' use of social media in communicating EIDs, and (3) evaluation of the accuracy of EID-related medical information on social media.Conclusions Although academic studies of EID communication on social media are on the rise, they still suffer from a lack of theorization and a need for more methodologic rigor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of trust in social systems leads to a feeling of insecurity and higher anxiety over personal and public security.

    “A lack of trust in social systems leads to a feeling of insecurity (Giddens, 1991) and higher anxiety over personal and public security (Tang et al., 2018).”

    From Intolerance of Uncertainty and Tendency to Worry as Mediators Between Trust in Institutions and Social Support and Fear of Coronavirus and Consequences of the Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Tang et al., 2018

    The Public response section reports anxiety in H1N1-related blog posts, and Practical implications notes public distrust of government during disease outbreaks. Tang et al. do not establish that lack of trust causes higher anxiety, or specifically describe anxiety about personal and public security. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 230

Authors
Tang, L., Bie, B., Park, S.-E., & Zhi, D.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Lu
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
962-972
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795888367
Cited by
230
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Keywords
social media, emerging infectious diseases, outbreak, H1N1 influenza, Ebola virus, H7N9 avian influenza, Twitter, public health communication, theoretical framework
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review