Cited by 12SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine against Omicron-related infections in the real world: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Guo, Kaixin, Ni, Peng, Chang, Shuailei, Jin, Yuefei, Duan, Guangcai, Zhang, Rongguang·2023·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the currently available mRNA vaccines and boosters for the Omicron variant. METHODS We searched for literature published on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and preprint servers (medRxiv and bioRxiv) from January 1, 2020 to June 20, 2022. The pooled effect estimate was calculated by the random-effects model. RESULTS We selected 34 eligible studies in the meta-analysis from 4336 records. For the two-dose vaccinated group, the mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 34.74%, 36% and 63.80% against any Omicron infection, symptomatic infection and severe infection, respectively. For the three-dose vaccinated group, the mRNA VE was 59.80%, 57.47% and 87.22% against any infection, symptomatic infection and severe infection. For the three-dose vaccinated group, the relative mRNA VE was 34.74 %, 37.36% and 63.80% against any infection, symptomatic infection and severe infection. Six months after the two-dose vaccination, VE with any infection, symptomatic infection, and severe infection decreased to 33.4%, 16.79%, and 60.43%. Three months after the three-dose vaccination, VE for any infection and severe infection decreased to 55.39% and 73.39%. CONCLUSIONS Two-dose mRNA vaccines failed to provide sufficient protection against any Omicron infection and symptomatic infection, while three-dose mRNA vaccines continued to provide effective protection after three months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.02.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 12

Authors
Guo, K., Ni, P., Chang, S., Jin, Y., Duan, G., & Zhang, R.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Rongguang
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
1049-1055
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321350493
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82160634)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (820CXTD438)
  • Hainan Medical University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, Omicron variant, vaccine effectiveness, booster vaccination, SARS-CoV-2, symptomatic infection, serious infections, waning immunity, real-world effectiveness
MeSH terms
mRNA Vaccines, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, RNA, Messenger, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review