Cited by 31Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Management and Research

Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Associated Mortality Among Diabetic Adults With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease

Pavkov, Meda E., Harding, Jessica L., Chou, Chiu-Fang, Saaddine, Jinan B.·2019·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To estimate prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among U.S. adults with diabetes and with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD), and assess associated risk of mortality. Design Cross-sectional study with national survey data. Methods The cohort included adults ≥40 years old with diabetes in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2005-2008. Vital status was determined through December 31, 2011. We defined diabetes as hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% or self-report and CKD by urinary albumin/creatinine ≥30 mg/g or glomerular filtration rate 2 . The main outcomes were DR and mortality. Results Prevalence of DR was 27.8% (95% CI 24.3-31.7), 36.2% (95%CI 30.1-42.7), and 23.4% (95% CI 19.2-28.1), overall, with and without CKD. Prevalence of vision-threatening DR was 4.2% (95% CI 3.2-5.5), 8.2% (95% CI 5.4-12.2), and 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-3.5), respectively. In a multivariable adjusted model, DR was positively but nonsignificantly associated with CKD (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.7), was 40% higher per 1% increase in hemoglobin A1c (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), was 30% higher per 5 years additional diabetes duration (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5), was 30% higher per 10 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5), and was 6-fold higher with insulin treatment (OR = 6.2, 95% CI 2.6-14.8). Compared with diabetic participants with neither DR nor CKD, those with DR and CKD had a 3.6-fold (95% CI 1.5-9.1) increased adjusted risk for all-cause m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavkov, M. E., Harding, J. L., Chou, C.-F., & Saaddine, J. B.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Pavkov, Meda E.
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
198
Pages
200-208
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898501420
Cited by
31
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, prevalence, mortality, vision-threatening retinopathy, HbA1c, diabetes duration, systolic blood pressure, insulin therapy, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, risk factors, NHANES, adults with diabetes, comorbidities, retinopathy severity, retinopathy progression, retinopathy regression
MeSH terms
Aged, Albuminuria, Blood Pressure, Creatinine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review