Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign

Open access
Haouili, Nada, Kravitz, Neal D., Vaid, Nikhilesh R., Ferguson, Donald J., Makki, Laith·2020·American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to provide an update on the accuracy of tooth movement with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif). METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 38 patients treated with Invisalign Full or Invisalign Teen. All teeth, from the central incisor to the second molar, were measured on digital models created from intraoral scans. Predicted values were determined by superimposing the initial and final ClinCheck models, and achieved values were determined by superimposing the initial ClinCheck models and the digital models from the posttreatment scans. Individual teeth were superimposed with a best-fit analysis and measured using Compare software (version 8.1; GeoDigm, Falcon Heights, Minn). The types of tooth movements studied were a mesial-distal crown tip, buccal-lingual crown tip, extrusion, intrusion, and mesial-distal rotation. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of Invisalign for all tooth movements was 50%. The highest overall accuracy was achieved with a buccal-lingual crown tip (56%), whereas the lowest overall accuracy occurred with rotation (46%). The accuracies for mesial rotation of the mandibular first molar (28%), distal rotation of the maxillary canine (37%), and intrusion of the mandibular incisors (35%) were particularly low. CONCLUSIONS: There was a marked improvement in the overall accuracy; however, the strengths and weaknesses of tooth movement with Invisalign remained relatively the same.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Haouili, N., Kravitz, N. D., Vaid, N. R., Ferguson, D. J., & Makki, L.
Venue
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
420-425
ISSN
0889-5406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038469606
Cited by
443
References
0
FWCI
45.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.015
The paper
Haouili, N., Kravitz, N. D., Vaid, N. R., Ferguson, D. J., & Makki, L. (2020). Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.