Fetal and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: a randomized study comparing insulin aspart with human insulin in 322 subjects
Abstract
Objective The objective of the study was a comparison of insulin aspart (IAsp) with human insulin (HI) in basal-bolus therapy with neutral protamine Hagedorn for fetal and perinatal outcomes of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy. Study design This was a randomized, parallel, open-label, controlled, multicenter, multinational study. Subjects were pregnant (gestational age; <10 weeks) or planning pregnancy at enrollment. Three hundred twenty-two women with type 1 diabetes received IAsp (n = 157) or HI (n = 165). Results For IAsp and HI, respectively, there were 137 and 131 live births and 14 and 21 fetal losses. Perinatal mortality was 14 and 22 per 1000 births; number of congenital malformations were 6 and 9; mean (SEM) birthweight corrected for gestational age was 3438 g (71.5) and 3555 g (72.9; P = .091). Mean gestational age was 37.6 vs 37.4 weeks. Preterm delivery occurred in 20.3% (IAsp) and 30.6% (HI) of pregnancies (P = .053). Conclusion The fetal outcome using IAsp was comparable with HI with a tendency toward fewer fetal losses and preterm deliveries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The safety of the use of aspart and detemir analogs was confirmed in randomized trials.
“The safety of the use of aspart and detemir analogs was confirmed in randomized trials [104,105,106]”
From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Hod, M., Damm, P., Kaaja, R., Visser, G. H. A., Dunne, F., Demidova, I., Hansen, A.-S. P., & Mersebach, H.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Hod, Moshe
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186.e1-186.e7
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998988655
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes in pregnancy, insulin aspart, human insulin, multiple daily insulin injections, NPH insulin, fetal outcomes, perinatal outcomes, fetal death, preterm birth, birth weight, congenital malformations, gestational age
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infant, Newborn, Insulin, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Diabetes, Gestational, Treatment Outcome, Stillbirth, Insulin Aspart
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review