Cited by 180Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsUreteral procedures and complications

Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence

Denman, Mary Anna, Gregory, W. Thomas, Boyles, Sarah H., Smith, Virginia, Edwards, S. Renee, Clark, Amanda L.·2008·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective This study measured the 10-year risk of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence (POPUI) in a community population.Study design We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of 374 women who were > 20 years old and who underwent surgery for POPUI in 1995.Results The 10-year reoperation rate was 17% by Kaplan Meier analysis. Previous POPUI surgery at the time of index surgery conferred a hazard ratio of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-3.2; P = .018). The abdominal approach was protective against reoperation compared with the vaginal approach (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.83; P = .02) With the use of Cox regression, no association was observed for age, vaginal parity, previous hysterectomy, body mass index, prolapse severity, ethnicity, chronic lung disease, smoking, estrogen status, surgical indication, or anatomic compartment.Conclusion A reoperation rate of 17% is unacceptably high and likely represents an underestimate of the true rate. Most of the factors that influence reoperation have not yet been identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 180

Authors
Denman, M. A., Gregory, W. T., Boyles, S. H., Smith, V., Edwards, S. R., & Clark, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Providence Portland Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
198
Issue
5
Pages
555.e1-555.e5
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025804200
Cited by
180
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ureteral procedures and complications
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, reoperation, long-term surgical outcomes, risk factors for reoperation, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Urinary Incontinence, Uterine Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review