Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis
Abstract
This systematic review of uterosacral ligament suspension provides a metaanalysis of anatomic outcomes and a summary of subjective outcomes. A successful anatomic outcome was considered present when women had "optimal" or "satisfactory" (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system stage 0 or 1) outcomes. In the anterior, apical, and posterior compartments, the pooled rates for a successful outcome were 81.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.5-94.5%), 98.3% (95% CI, 95.7-100%), and 87.4% (95% CI, 67.5-94.5%). In the anterior compartment, women with preoperative stage 2 prolapse were more likely than those with preoperative stage 3 prolapse to have a successful anatomic outcome (92.4% vs 66.8%; P = .06). Outcomes, with respect to subjective symptoms, were reassuring; however, it was not possible to pool data because of methodologic differences between studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The need to perform ureteral implantation to recover from ureteral injury is estimated to be 0.6%.
“the need to perform ureteral implantation to recover from ureteral injury is estimated to be only 0.6%. 19”
From Native-tissue prolapse repair: Efficacy and adverse effects of uterosacral ligaments suspension at 10-year follow up (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Margulies, R. U., Rogers, M. A. M., & Morgan, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-134
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038225835
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- uterosacral ligament suspension, pelvic organ prolapse, surgical outcomes, anatomical outcomes, subjective symptoms, anterior compartment, posterior compartment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Humans, Ligaments, Middle Aged, Reoperation, Sacrum, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review