Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Normal fetal growth is a critical component of a healthy pregnancy and influences the long-term health of the offspring. However, defining normal and abnormal fetal growth has been a long-standing challenge in clinical practice and research. We review various references and standards that are used widely to evaluate fetal growth and discuss common pitfalls of current definitions of abnormal fetal growth. Pros and cons of different approaches to customize fetal growth standards are described. We further discuss recent advances toward an integrated definition for fetal growth restriction. Such a definition may incorporate fetal size with the status of placental health that is measured by maternal and fetal Doppler velocimetry and biomarkers, biophysical findings, and genetics. Although the concept of an integrated definition appears promising, further development and testing are required. An improved definition of abnormal fetal growth should benefit both research and clinical practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
microRNA-155 appears to downregulate CCN1 expression in pre-eclampsia.
“Further post-transcriptional regulation involves microRNA-155, which appears to downregulate CCN1 expression in pre-eclampsia [49].”
From CCN1/CYR61: the very model of a modern matricellular protein (2011) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 126 · Cited by 264
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetricians-Gynecologists No. 12 2000
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Merialdi, M., Platt, L. D., & Kramer, M. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 522-528
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2878887
- OpenAlex
- W2125012706
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- fetal growth, fetal growth restriction, fetal growth standards, fetal size, placental health, Doppler velocimetry, offspring health
- MeSH terms
- Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Fetal Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review