Cited by 212Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Open access

Korbly, Nicole B., Kassis, Nadine C., Good, Meadow M., Richardson, Monica L., Book, Nicole M., Yip, Sallis, Saguan, Docile, Gross, Carey, Evans, Janelle, Lopes, Vrishali V., Harvie, Heidi S., Sung, Vivian W.·2013·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to describe patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and to describe predictors of preference for uterine preservation.Study design This multicenter, cross-sectional study evaluated patient preferences for uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in women with prolapse symptoms who were being examined for initial urogynecologic evaluation. Before meeting the physician, the women completed a questionnaire that asked them to indicate their prolapse treatment preference (uterine preservation vs hysterectomy) for scenarios in which the efficacy of treatment varied. Patient characteristics that were associated with preferences were determined, and predictors for uterine preservation preference were identified with multivariable logistic regression.Results Two hundred thirteen women participated. Assuming outcomes were equal between hysterectomy and uterine preservation, 36% of the women preferred uterine preservation; 20% of the women preferred hysterectomy, and 44% of the women had no strong preference. If uterine preservation was superior, 46% of the women preferred uterine preservation, and 11% of the women preferred hysterectomy. If hysterectomy was superior, 21% of the women still preferred uterine preservation, despite inferior efficacy. On multivariable logistic regression, women in the South had decreased odds of preferring uterine preservation compared with women in the Northeast (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.66). Women with at least some college education (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.08-7.62) and those who believed that the uterus is important for their sense of self (OR, 28.2; 95% CI, 5.00-158.7) had increased odds for preferring uterine preservation.Conclusion A higher proportion of women with prolapse symptoms who were examined for urogynecologic evaluation preferred uterine preservation, compared with hysterectomy. Geographic region, education level, and belief that the uterus is important for a sense of self were predictors of preference for uterine preservation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7)
Barber, M. D., Walters, M. D., & Bump, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025 · Cited by 1,357
Forecasting the Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in U.S. Women
Wu, J. M., Hundley, A. F., Fulton, R. G., & Myers, E. R. (2009) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c2ce96 · Cited by 767
Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003
Wu, J. M., Wechter, M. E., Geller, E. J., Nguyen, T. V., & Visco, A. G. (2007) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000285997.38553.4b · Cited by 672
Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004
Whiteman, M. K., Hillis, S. D., Jamieson, D. J., Morrow, B., Podgornik, M. N., Brett, K. M., & Marchbanks, P. A. (2007) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039 · Cited by 639
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
Robinson, A., & Thomson, R. (2001) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qhc.0100034 · Cited by 342
Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women
Hagen, S., & Stark, D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003882.pub4 · Cited by 326
Attitudes Toward Hysterectomy in Women Undergoing Evaluation for Uterovaginal Prolapse
Frick, A. C., Barber, M. D., Paraiso, M. F. R., Ridgeway, B., Jelovsek, J. E., & Walters, M. D. (2013) · Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/spv.0b013e31827d8667 · Cited by 149
The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA
Shah, A. D., Kohli, N., Rajan, S. S., & Hoyte, L. P. J. (2007) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-007-0457-y · Cited by 147
Decision Making, Beliefs, and Attitudes toward Hysterectomy: A Focus Group Study with Medically Underserved Women in Texas
Groff, J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Byrd, T. L., Shelton, A. J., Lees, E., & Goode, J. (2000) · Journal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine · doi:10.1089/152460900318759 · Cited by 55
Predictors of Hysterectomy Use and Satisfaction
Kuppermann, M., Learman, L. A., Schembri, M. E., Gregorich, S. E., Jackson, R., Jacoby, A. F., Lewis, J., & Washington, A. E. (2010) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181cf46a0 · Cited by 46

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 212

Trends in patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and associated complications over time in pelvic organ prolapse repair
Rosenberg, H., Leybovitz‐Haleluya, N., Saban, A., Weintraub, A. Y., & Rotem, R. (2025) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.054 · Cited by 6
Vesicouterine Fistula: A Robotic Approach
Baker, M. V., Kisby, C. K., & Occhino, J. A. (2021) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04940-6 · Cited by 6
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension with suture line instead of mesh
Liang, J., Chen, G., Deng, L., Liu, F., Lj, W., Li, Q., Shen, X., Yj, Y., & Ling, B. (2017) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14735 · Cited by 6
Time-frame comparison of hystero-preservation in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study, 2006–2013 versus 1997–2005
Lin, Y.-L., Lo, T.-S., Long, C.-Y., Law, K., Ho, C.-H., & Wu, M.-P. (2019) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04128-z · Cited by 5
Information Priorities for Deciding on Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Gerjevic, K. A., Erekson, E. A., Strohbehn, K., Jacobs, K. A., Hanissian, P. D., & Aarts, J. W. M. (2018) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000572 · Cited by 8
A Retrospective Cohort Study of vNOTES Extraperitoneal Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy With Uterine Preserving Regarding Surgical Outcomes and Two-Year Follow-Up Results
Dou, Y., Deng, L., Liang, X., Cao, F., Chen, B., Tang, S., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.013 · Cited by 7
Thermodynamic Work of High-Grade Uterine Prolapse Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Mesh Repair with Total Hysterectomy
Lau, H., Lai, C., Hsieh, M., Peng, H., Chou, D., Su, T.-H., Lee, J.-J., & Lin, T. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11090875 · Cited by 5
Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse
Hickman, L. C., Tran, M. C., Paraiso, M. F. R., Walters, M. D., & Ferrando, C. A. (2021) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 · Cited by 5
The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Mao, M., Fu, H., Wang, Q., Bai, J., Zhang, Y., & Guo, R. (2023) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.01.005 · Cited by 6
Laparoscopic Long Mesh Surgery with Augmented Round Ligaments: A Novel Uterine Preservation Procedure For Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Long, C., Wang, C., Lin, K., Ker, C.-R., Loo, Z.-X., Liu, Y., & Wu, P.-C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63725-x · Cited by 5
Manchester repair (‘Fothergill’s operation’) revisited
Dharmasena, D., Spence‐Jones, C., Khasriya, R., & Yoong, W. (2021) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/tog.12724 · Cited by 5
The Role of Uterine Preservation at the Time of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
Chang, O. H., Carter Ramirez, A., Edwards, A., Chill, H. H., Letko, J., Woodburn, K. L., & Cundiff, G. W. (2025) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001667 · Cited by 4
Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid‐compartment prolapse: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Wang, Q., Manodoro, S., Jiang, X., & Lin, C. (2025) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.15053 · Cited by 4
Comparative Outcomes of Uterus-Preserving and Hysterectomy Approaches in Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension
Coşkun, E. S., Bacak, H. B., Kumbasar, S., Gencer, F. K., İrice, F., Çelikoğlu, E., Abeş, S., Özbay, T., Peköz, H. R., Erdem, B., et al. (2025) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-025-06398-2 · Cited by 4
Factors associated with hysterectomy among older women from Latin America and the Caribbean
Escobar, D. A., Botero, A. M., Cash, M. G., & Ortíz, C. (2015) · Women & Health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2015.1101738 · Cited by 4
Cervical Elongation - The Search for a Definition.
Shemer, O., Vinikov, Y., Shaubi-Rosen, M., & Levy, G. (2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.487 · Cited by 4
Subjective Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy: Cohort Study
Lange, S., Carlin, G. L., Zängle, R., Heinzl, F., Umek, W. H., & Bodner‐Adler, B. (2024) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001449 · Cited by 5
Therapeutic Options for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Bouchard, B., & Campeau, L. (2025) · Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal · doi:10.3390/siuj6010011 · Cited by 4
Utility of anterior vaginal wall length measurement in vaginal reconstructive surgery
Collins, A. F., Doyle, P. J., Vilasagar, S., & Buchsbaum, G. M. (2016) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3247-6 · Cited by 4
Laparoscopy in urogynaecology
Khasriya, R., Vashisht, A., & Cutner, A. S. (2018) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/tog.12449 · Cited by 4
Reproductive Results in Cancer Survivors after Fertility Sparing Management: The Need for the Standardization of Definitions
Piątek, S., Szymusik, I., & Bidziński, M. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15143569 · Cited by 4
Apical Prolapse: Is There a Best Approach?
Heft, J. S., & Adam, R. A. (2018) · Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports · doi:10.1007/s11884-018-0469-0 · Cited by 4
Clinical Analysis of the Discovery of Malignant Gynecological Tumors in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Niu, L., Wang, J., Li, X., Xu, Y., Qiu, L.-R., Guo, S., Zhang, L., & Shang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.877857 · Cited by 3
Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Hwang, W. Y., Jeon, M. J., & Suh, D. H. (2024) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.018 · Cited by 4
Oncologic outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy vs. Standard radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D. E., Saffati, G., Wahlstedt, E., Chaput, M., Patel, S. R., Salgado‐Garza, G., Kronstedt, S., Segall, M. R., Angulo-Lozano, J. C., Jones, J. A., et al. (2024) · Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024 · Cited by 3
Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: A Systematic Review
Pitsillidi, A., Vona, L., Bettocchi, S., Schiermeier, S., & Noé, G. K. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14082777 · Cited by 3
The Effect of Age on Surgical Outcomes Following Uterine Preserving Surgery for Treatment of Apical Prolapse
Chill, H. H., Shusel, O., Dick, A., Moss, N. P., Cohen, A., Salzman, A. R., & Shveiky, D. (2022) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2022.08.005 · Cited by 3
Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment
Napoé, G. S., Luchristt, D., Sridhar, A., Ellington, D. R., Ridgeway, B., Mazloomdoost, D., Sung, V. W., Ninivaggio, C. S., Harvie, H. S., Santiago‐Lastra, Y., et al. (2022) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05411-2 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study (eVAULT)
Fitzgerald, J. J., Sokol, E. R., Rardin, C. R., Cundiff, G. W., Paraiso, M. F. R., Chou, J., & Gutman, R. E. (2022) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001188 · Cited by 3
Importancia de una intervención psicoeducativa sobre sexualidad en mujeres sometidas a una histerectomía. Una revisión de la literature
Muñoz, M. A. S. (2017) · Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología · doi:10.4067/s0717-75262017000600666 · Cited by 3
Prolapso dos órgãos pélvicos
(2025) · Femina · doi:10.61622/0100-7254537202507 · Cited by 2
Understanding the Value of the Uterus: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey on Women's Preferences With Benign Gynecological Conditions
Huynh, A., Horner, W., Antosh, D. D., Meyer, I., Winkelman, W. D., Halder, G. E., Ton, J., Meriwether, K. V., Hudson, P. L., Ringel, N. E., et al. (2026) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.03.009 · Cited by 2
Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation With Transvaginal Mesh: Is Hysterectomy a Risk Factor for Complications?
Breton, F., Abdirahman, S., Fatton, B., Calletwaert, G., de Tayrac, R., & Allègre, L. (2021) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001006 · Cited by 2
The Pros and Cons of Hystero-preservation on Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Chen, C.-C., Peng, I., & Wu, M. (2023) · Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy · doi:10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23 · Cited by 4
Attitudes Toward Hysterectomy in Saudi Arabian Women Undergoing Evaluation for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Cross-Sectional Study
Baalharith, M. A., Alsary, S. A., Bamanie, E., Mowallad, S. A., Makki, J., Basudan, S. K., Alotaibi, S. A., Alabdulkareem, M. E., & Abu‐Zaid, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.49967 · Cited by 2
Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse
Cox, K. R., Ferzandi, T. R., Dancz, C. E., Mandelbaum, R. S., Klar, M., Wright, J. D., & Matsuo, K. (2024) · AJOG Global Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100322 · Cited by 2
Workshop on cultivating shared decision making to improve surgical outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse
Cundiff, G. W., Sanaee, M., & Schulz, J. A. (2024) · Continence · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2024.101318 · Cited by 2
Decision-Making Interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Environmental Scan
Yen, R. W., Coyle, A. C., Siwak, K. C., Aarts, J. W. M., Spinnewijn, L., & Barr, P. J. (2024) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2024.0160 · Cited by 2
Is it worth preserving the uterus? unanticipated pathology in hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
Pandey, D., Inukollu, P. R., Shetty, J., Hebbar, S. S., Pai, M. V., & Kumar, P. (2018) · International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184143 · Cited by 2
Hegde's Modification of Fothergill Surgery for Cervical Elongation: A 7-Year Retrospective Review
Chavali, K., Hiremath, A. C., & Ramamurthy, C. (2020) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2020.10.010 · Cited by 2
Role of Hysterectomy at the Time of Native Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
Chughtai, B. I., Thomas, D. D. M., Mao, J., Asfaw, T. S., & Sedrakyan, A. (2018) · Journal of Gynecologic Surgery · doi:10.1089/gyn.2017.0101 · Cited by 2
Préserver ou non l’utérus en cas de chirurgie du prolapsus : revue de la littérature
Joueidi, Y., Gueudry, P., Cardaillac, C., Vaucel, E., Lopès, P., Winer, N., Dochez, V., & Thubert, T. (2019) · The French Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.001 · Cited by 2
Apical prolapse surgery
Maher, C. (2021) · Pelvic Floor Disorders · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_55 · Cited by 1
Pilsner Modification of Mesh Sacrohysterocolpopexy (PiMMS): An Initial Report on Safety and Efficacy
Vidoman, M., Kališ, V., Smažinka, M., Havir, M., Rušavý, Z., & Ismail, K. M. (2024) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-024-05780-w · Cited by 1
Pelvic Floor Disorders and Female Sexuality II: Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Acedo, S. A., Torres, L. R., & Cerro, C. R. (2024) · Trends in andrology and sexual medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55080-5_7 · Cited by 1
Unexpected Pathology During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in an Urban Population
Gandelsman-Ginis, J., Bentley, S., Khan, F. G., Brincat, C., & O’Shea, M. S. (2024) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001595 · Cited by 2
Does Colpocleisis Still Hold Value? The Evolution of Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Comparative National Database Study
Degirmenci, Y., Shehaj, I., Alexa, M., Klamminger, G. G., Schmidt, M. W., Hofmann, K., Hasenburg, A., & Schwab, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14051414 · Cited by 1
Robotic Sacrocolpopexy With Versus Without Supracervical Hysterectomy
Blondeau, A., Chommeloux, M., Haudebert, C., Richard, C., Dubois, A., Peñafiel, J., Manunta, A. F., Hascoët, J., & Peyronnet, B. (2025) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-025-06253-4 · Cited by 1
Reported outcomes and outcome measures in RCTs of laparoscopic and robotic interventions for pelvic organ prolapse in women: a systematic review.
Pagkaki, C., Ediripolage, F., Papalois, K.-B., Elfituri, A., Haddad, J., Roman, M., Tsakos, E., Falconi, G., Betschart, C., & Doumouchtsis, S. (2025) · European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114819 · Cited by 1
Management of the Uterus During Prolapse Surgery: Hysterectomy vs Uterine Preservation
Yacoel, T., Yarborough, C. C., Amin, K. A., & Syan, R. (2026) · Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports · doi:10.1007/s11884-025-00798-2 · Cited by 1
The Manchester procedure: A systematic review of recurrence, perioperative measures, and financial cost, and a scoping review of sexual dysfunction, gynecologic cancer, and obstetric outcomes
Elissaoui, S., Issaoui, M. E., Klarskov, N., & Husby, K. R. (2026) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.70209 · Cited by 1
Pessary: A Rediscovered Tool
Cattoni, E., Sorice, P., & Leidi-Bulla, L. (2018) · Urodynamics, neurourology and pelvic floor dysfunctions · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59195-7_7 · Cited by 1
Unilateral Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Hysteropexy: a Single-Center Experience
Sanderson, D. J., Matloubieh, J., & Buchsbaum, G. M. (2020) · SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s42399-020-00327-8 · Cited by 1
Abdominal sacrohysteropexy UV prolapse and preservation of reproduction.
ALI, R., Ehsan, R., Niaz, G., & Abid, F. (2021) · The Professional Medical Journal · doi:10.29309/tpmj/2021.28.05.4562 · Cited by 1
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
(2017) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000430 · Cited by 3
Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension—Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery
Woodburn, K. L., Yuan, A. S., Torosis, M., Roberts, K., Ferrando, C. A., & Gutman, R. E. (2022) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001304 · Cited by 2
Comparison of laparoscopic hysteropectopexy and vaginal hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
LEE, J. N., YIM, M. H., NA, Y. J., SONG, Y. J., & KIM, H. G. (2023) · Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.23736/s2724-606x.23.05236-3 · Cited by 1
A Laparoscopic Conservative Surgery Approach to Puerperium Complicated by Uterine Prolapse After Vaginal Delivery: A Case Series
Seca, M., Algeri, P., Colonna, L., Mastrocola, N., & Wunster, S. V. (2023) · Journal of Family & Reproductive Health · doi:10.18502/jfrh.v17i1.11980 · Cited by 1
Old meets new: vNOTES retroperitoneal promontory fixation in conjunction with the uterus preserving Manchester procedure✰,✰✰
Baekelandt, J. F., & Stuart, A. (2023) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102628 · Cited by 1
RETRACTED: Effect of different surgical techniques on postoperative wound infection in patients with uterine prolapse: A meta‐analysis
Wang, J., Shang, X., Huang, J., & Wang, J. (2024) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.14588
Retracted
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with SERATEX® SlimSling® Mesh: A Retrospective Case Series
Rotem, R., Alkeesh, Y., Hirsch, A., Ben‐Shachar, I., & Marcus-Braun, N. (2025) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-024-06037-2 · Cited by 1
Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: How, When and for Whom Is It an Alternative Option? A Narrative Review of the Literature
Pitsillidi, A., & Noé, G. K. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14041080 · Cited by 1
Management Approaches for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse in the Geriatric Population
Rashid, T., Alkassis, M., Griebling, T. L., Kocjancic, E., Souders, C., & Winters, J. C. (2025) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2025.01.008 · Cited by 1
Comparison of concomitant hysterectomy and uterine preservation for pelvic floor reconstruction using transvaginal mesh in the treatment of POP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lou, J., & Guo, F. (2025) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-025-03643-0 · Cited by 1
Uterine Conservation at the Time of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment: the Options for Patients and Providers
Zigman, J. S., & Yazdany, T. (2016) · Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13669-016-0146-2 · Cited by 1
Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report
Cucinella, G., Culmone, S., Guastella, E., Gentile, F., Maria, F. D., Granà, R., Carlisi, B., Rotolo, S., & Calagna, G. (2020) · International Journal of Surgery Case Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055 · Cited by 1
Role of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Vaginal Middle Compartment Prolapse
Brito, L. G. O., Riccetto, C., & Palma, P. C. R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_35 · Cited by 1
Perioperative complications of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrocolpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
Alanazi, S., Alshammari, N., Jrais, A., Alharbi, N., Alsaadoon, M., Alanazi, Y., & Alsahabi, J. (2026) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-026-02211-4
“Recently, uterine-preserving surgery has gained popularity, with up to 36% of patients preferring this approach if outcomes are comparable [11].”
The Endurance of Dr. Guido’s Team Should Motivate More Physicians
Craciunas, L. (2014) · Reproductive System & Sexual Disorders · doi:10.4172/2161-038x.1000131
UTERUS KORUYUCU PELVİK ORGAN PROLAPSUS TEDAVİSİ UTERUS SPARING PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE SURGERY
Güngör, F., Yaşa, C., Baştu, E., Dural, Ö., & Yalçın, Ö. (2013)
Uterine Prolapse and Preservation Methods: a Literature Review
Pere, M., & Gomelsky, A. (2017) · Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports · doi:10.1007/s11884-017-0400-0
The Role of Hysterectomy in Genitourinary Prolapse
Serati, M., & Sorice, P. (2018) · Urodynamics, neurourology and pelvic floor dysfunctions · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59195-7_12
Pelvic floor prolapse/urinary incontinence
Smilen, S. W., Ferrante, K., Glass, D., & Malacarne, D. R. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119072980.ch10
What Is New in Uterine Conservation in the Clinical Setting of Uterovaginal Prolapse?
Richter, H. E. (2019) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003447
Histopathology findings of the pelvic organ prolapse
CORPAS, F. M. A., ILLARRAMENDI, A., Nozar, F., & Caserta, B. (2019) · Pelviperineology · doi:10.34057/ppj.2019.38.02.003
Female pelvic floor disorders : clinical aspects on surgical treatments
Bergman, I. (2020) · Figshare
Caring for the FPMRS Patient of Childbearing Age: NYU Case of the Month, January 2020.
Pape, D. M. (2020) · PubMed Central
Vaginal mesh hysteropexy: a review
DiCarlo-Meacham, A., & Mazloomdoost, D. (2021) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000748
Open Transabdominal Sacrocolpopexy
Tenggardjaja, C. F., & Vasavada, S. P. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1504-0_7
Sacrohysteropexy
Chughtai, B. I., & Thomas, D. D. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59611-2_9
Open Transabdominal Sacrocolpopexy
Tenggardjaja, C. F., Kern, T. A., & Vasavada, S. P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28319-3_7
WITHDRAWN: Effects of Uterine Preservation on Long-term Subjective Outcomes of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Ng, S., Tsui, K.-P., Huang, L., & Chen, G. (2019) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology X · doi:10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100077
Retracted
Robotic sacrohysteropexy: an instructional video for uterovaginal prolapse repair in patients with desired uterine preservation
Warehime, J. M., Cope, Z. S., Feroz, R. T., Lenger, S. M., Gupta, A., & Francis, S. L. (2022) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05260-z
Options and outcomes for uterine preservation at the time of prolapse surgery
Woodburn, K. L. (2022) · OBG Management · doi:10.12788/obgm.0229
Role of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Vaginal Middle Compartment Prolapse
Brito, L. G. O., Riccetto, C., & Palma, P. C. R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71112-2_35-1
Surgical treatment for apical vaginal prolapse
van Oudheusden, A. M. J. (2023) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20231010ao
Mostafa Maged sling technique to treat prolapsed uterus in an easy way (New Technique)
Ali, M. M. (2023) · Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.4314/ejhs.v33i5.22
A new technique for uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Laparoscopic rectus abdominis hysteropexy for uterine prolapse by comparing with traditional techniques
Li, Z., Zheng, Y., Shen, F., Liu, M., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · Open Medicine · doi:10.1515/med-2023-0833
Routine uterine preservation during sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse – pro
Thubert, T., & Degez, M. (2023) · The French Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.purol.2023.11.002
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Lyu, C., Cheon, W. C., Ngan, H., Wei, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/67239 · Cited by 1
Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Porcari, I., Bosco, M., Zorzato, P. C., Garzon, S., & Uccella, S. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.16108
Manchester operation: an effective indication for uterine prolapse at any age with or without a hypertrophic cervix
Mendes, P., Veiga, C. R., & Almeida, G. (2025) · Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo · doi:10.55905/cuadv17n2-107
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Mesh for Apical and Anterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Report of 3 Cases in Yaoundé Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Cameroon
Tompeen, I., Yaneu, J. N., Um, E. M. N., Sama, D. J., & Foumane, P. (2025) · Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.4236/ojog.2025.157096
Laparoszkópos sacrocolpopexia: technikai áttekintés és standardizált lépések
Sipos, A. G., Kozma, B., Farkas, B., Domján, Z., Takács, P., Krasznai, Z., & Lampé, R. (2025) · Orvosi Hetilap · doi:10.1556/650.2025.33309
“I Feel Chained Right Now”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Treatment Decision-Making Among Individuals With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Wentzel, K. E., Rubin, S. C., Coots, C., Mesa, A., Galaviz, V. D., Keltz, J., Stifani, B. M., & Ryntz, T. (2025) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.10.002
Laparoscopic Transvesical Versus Extravesical Uterovesical Fistula Repair
Arafa, H., Mousa, W. E., Hossam, M., Yassin, M. A., & Farouk, A. (2025) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001772
Study of Knowledge and Attitude of Posthysterectomized Patients
Ethiraj, G., Youthika, J., & Selvam, A. (2025) · Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2764
Additional file 3 of Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
Gagyor, D., Kališ, V., Smažinka, M., Rušavý, Z., Pilka, R., & Ismail, K. M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14052567
Additional file 2 of Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
Gagyor, D., Kališ, V., Smažinka, M., Rušavý, Z., Pilka, R., & Ismail, K. M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14052564
Additional file 4 of Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
Gagyor, D., Kališ, V., Smažinka, M., Rušavý, Z., Pilka, R., & Ismail, K. M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14052570

Authors: Korbly, N. B., Kassis, N. C., Good, M. M., Richardson, M. L., Book, N. M., Yip, S., Saguan, D., Gross, C., Evans, J., Lopes, V. V., Harvie, H. S., & Sung, V. W.
Affiliations: Brown University (US)
Indiana University Hospital (US)
Stanford Medicine (US)
Riverside Methodist Hospital (US)
Yale University (US)
Emory University (US)
Cleveland Clinic Florida (US)
Christ Hospital (US)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author: Korbly, Nicole B.
ORCID: Harvie, Heidi S.
Venue: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2013-11
Volume: 209
Issue: 5
Pages: 470.e1-470.e6
ISSN: 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003
OpenAlex: W2043921323
Cited by: 211
References: 15
Citations by year: 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI: 6.02
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Society of Gynecologic Surgeons
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse, uterine preservation, hysterectomy, patient preferences, treatment preferences, regional variation, educational attainment, selfhood
MeSH terms: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Geography, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, United States, Uterine Prolapse, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient Preference, Organ Sparing Treatments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks