Cited by 37Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Factors associated with high-risk HPV positivity in a low-resource setting in sub-Saharan Africa

Mitchell, Sheona M., Sekikubo, Musa, Biryabarema, Christine, Byamugisha, Josaphat J.K., Steinberg, Malcolm, Jeronimo, Jose, Money, Deborah M., Christilaw, Jan +1 more·2014·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective We sought to determine demographic and behavioral factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in a community-based HPV self-collection cervical cancer screening pilot project. Study design HPV self-collected samples were obtained from 199 women aged 30-69 years in the impoverished urban Ugandan community of Kisenyi, during September through November 2011. Demographic and behavioral information was collected. Descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model were used to analyze factors associated with HPV positivity. Results There was overwhelming acceptance of HPV self-collection in this community. High-risk HPV prevalence was found to be 17.6%. Lower levels of formal education (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-2.03) were associated with higher prevalence of HPV as was use of oral contraception (AOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.83-4.90) and human immunodeficiency virus status (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.14-1.37). Conclusion Screening should be targeted and prioritized for women with lower levels of education, oral contraceptive use, and human immunodeficiency virus positivity as they have the highest HPV prevalence in this low-resource population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 37

Authors
Mitchell, S. M., Sekikubo, M., Biryabarema, C., Byamugisha, J. J. K., Steinberg, M., Jeronimo, J., Money, D. M., Christilaw, J., & Ogilvie, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Mulago Hospital (UG)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Ogilvie, Gina S.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
210
Issue
1
Pages
81.e1-81.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978616412
Cited by
37
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
high-risk HPV, HPV prevalence, HPV self-collection, cervical cancer screening, resource-limited settings, oral contraceptive use, HIV status, educational attainment, risk factors, women's health, Uganda
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Health Resources, Health Surveys, Humans, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Risk Factors, Vaginal Smears, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Africa South of the Sahara, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review