Cited by 65Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and PregnancyMaternal and fetal healthcare

Risk of placental dysfunction disorders after prior miscarriages: a population-based study

Open access
Gunnarsdottir, Johanna, Stephansson, Olof, Cnattingius, Sven, Åkerud, Helena, Wikström, Anna-Karin·2014·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The objective of the investigation was to study the association between prior miscarriages and the risks of placental dysfunction disorders, including preeclampsia, stillbirth, birth of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant, placental abruption, and spontaneous preterm birth.Study design In a population-based cohort study including 619,587 primiparous women, we estimated risks of placental dysfunction disorders for women with 1 (n = 68,185), 2 (n = 11,410) and 3 or more (n = 3823) self-reported prior miscarriages. Risks were calculated as odds ratios by unconditional logistic regression analysis and adjustments were made for maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index, height, smoking habits, country of birth, years of formal education, in vitro fertilization, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, hypothyroidism, systemic lupus erythematosis, fetal sex, and year of childbirth.Results Compared with women with no prior miscarriage, women with 1 prior miscarriage had almost no increased risks. Women with 2 prior miscarriages had increased risks of spontaneous preterm birth, preterm (<37 weeks) SGA infant, and placental abruption. The rates of all disorders were higher for women with 3 or more prior miscarriages compared with women without prior miscarriages: preeclampsia, 5.83% vs 4.27%; stillbirth, 0.69% vs 0.33%, SGA infant, 5.09% vs 3.22%, placental abruption, 0.81% vs 0.41%; and spontaneous preterm birth, 6.45% vs 4.40%. The adjusted odds ratios for preterm (<37 weeks) disorders in women with 3 prior miscarriages were approximately 2.Conclusion History of 2 or more miscarriages is associated with an increased risk of placental dysfunction disorders and should be regarded as a risk factor in antenatal care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher levels of serum organochlorine pesticides are found in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.

    “This epidemiological study correlates with a clinical study demonstrating higher levels of serum organochlorine pesticides in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls. 95”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Abstract and Statistical methods describe a population-based study of prior miscarriages and subsequent placental dysfunction disorders, not a clinical comparison of serum pesticide levels. Searches for organochlorine pesticides, serum levels, and environmental exposure found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Immunology of pre- eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010;63: 534-43.
  2. Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Preg- nancy outcome following recurrent sponta- neous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;118:61-5.

Authors
Gunnarsdottir, J., Stephansson, O., Cnattingius, S., Åkerud, H., & Wikström, A.-K.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
211
Issue
1
Pages
34.e1-34.e8
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052277321
Cited by
65
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
placental insufficiency, preeclampsia, stillbirth, small for gestational age, placental abruption, spontaneous preterm birth, primiparous women
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Parity, Placenta Diseases, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Registries, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Premature Birth, Stillbirth, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review