Comprehensive maternal hemorrhage protocols reduce the use of blood products and improve patient safety
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of instituting a comprehensive protocol for the treatment of maternal hemorrhage within a large health care system. A comprehensive maternal hemorrhage protocol was initiated within a health care system with 29 different delivery units and with >60,000 annual births. Compliance with key elements of the protocol was assessed monthly by a dedicated perinatal safety nurse at each site and validated during site visits by system perinatal nurse specialist. Outcome variables were the total number of units of blood transfused and the number of puerperal hysterectomies. Three time points were assessed: (1) 2 months before implementation of the protocol, (2) a 2-month period that was measured at 5 months after implementation of the protocol, and (3) a 2-month period at 10 months after implementation. There were 32,059 deliveries during the 3 study periods. Relative to baseline, there was a significant reduction in blood product use per 1000 births (-25.9%; P < .01) and a nonsignificant reduction (-14.8%; P = .2) in the number of patients who required puerperal hysterectomy. Within a large health care system, the application of a standardized method to address maternal hemorrhage significantly reduced maternal morbidity, based on the need for maternal transfusion and peripartum hysterectomy. These data support implementation of standardized methods for postpartum care and treatment of maternal hemorrhage and support that this approach will reduce maternal morbidity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 276
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15]15. Leduc D, Senikas V, Lalonde A. Active management of the third stage of labor: prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2009;235: 980-93.
- [25]25. Tourne G, Collet F, Lasnier P, Seffert P. [Usefulness of a collecting bag for the diagnosis of post-partum hemorrhage]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2004;33:229-34.
- Authors
- Shields, L. E., Wiesner, S., Fulton, J., & Pelletreau, B.
- Affiliations
- Dignity Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shields, Laurence E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272-280
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021405725
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- maternal hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, standardized care protocols, blood transfusion, peripartum hysterectomy, maternal morbidity, protocol adherence, perinatal safety, postpartum care
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Blood Transfusion, Clinical Protocols, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Hemostatic Techniques, Humans, Hysterectomy, Pregnancy, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review