Cited by 34Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsHernia repair and managementOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

Characterization of the T-cell response to polypropylene mesh in women with complications

Open access
Tennyson, Lauren, Rytel, Matthew, Palcsey, Stacy, Meyn, Leslie, Liang, Rui, Moalli, Pamela·2019·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Background Polypropylene mesh is used widely for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Although these surgeries demonstrate favorable functional and anatomic outcomes, their use has been limited by complications, the 2 most common being exposure and pain. Growing evidence suggests that T lymphocytes play a critical role in the regulation of the host response to biomaterials. Objective The purpose of this study was to define and characterize the T-cell response and to correlate the response to collagen deposition in fibrotic capsules in mesh tissue complexes that are removed for the complications of pain vs exposure. Study design Patients who were scheduled to undergo a surgical excision of mesh for pain or exposure at Magee-Women's Hospital were offered enrollment. Forty-two mesh-vagina tissue complexes were removed for the primary complaint of exposure (n=24) vs pain (n=18). Twenty-one patients agreed to have an additional vaginal biopsy away from the site of mesh that served as control tissue. T cells were examined via immunofluorescent labeling for cell surface markers CD4+ (T h), CD8+ (cytotoxic) and foxp3 (T-regulatory cell). Frozen sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for gross morphologic condition and picrosirius red for collagen fiber analysis. Interrupted sodium-dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis was used to quantify the content of collagens type I and III, and the collagen III/I ratio. Transforming growth factor-β and connective tissue growth factor, which are implicated in the development of fibrosis, were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Data were analyzed with the Student's t tests, mixed effects linear regression, and Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results Demographic data were not different between groups, except for body mass index, which was 31.7 kg/m 2 for the exposure group and 28.2 kg/m 2 for pain (P=.04). Tissue complexes demonstrated a marked, but highly localized, foreign body response. We consistently observed a teardrop-shaped fibroma that encapsulated mesh fibers in both pain and exposure groups, with the T cells localized within the tip of this configuration away from the mesh-tissue interface. All 3 T-cell populations were significantly increased relative to control: CD4+ T helper (P<.001), foxp3+ T regulatory (P<.001), and CD8+ cytotoxic T cell (P=.034) in the exposure group. In the pain group, only T-helper (P<.001) and T-regulatory cells (P<.001) were increased, with cytotoxic T cells (P=.520) not different from control. Picrosirius red staining showed a greater area of green (thin) fibers in the exposure group (P=.025) and red (thick) fibers in the pain group (P<.001). The ratio of area green/(yellow + orange + red) that represented thin vs thick fibers was significantly greater in the exposure group (P=.005). Analysis of collagen showed that collagen type I was increased by 35% in samples with mesh complications (exposure and pain) when compared with control samples (P=.043). Strong correlations between the profibrosis cytokine transforming growth factor-β and collagen type I and III were found in patients with pain (r≥0.833; P=.01) but not exposure (P>.7). Conclusion T cells appear to play a critical role in the long-term host response to mesh and may be a central pathway that leads to complications. The complexity of this response warrants further investigation and has the potential to broaden our understanding of mesh biology and clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.121

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mesh-related complications of PP, such as erosion or infection, may necessitate surgical removal of the implant.

    “Additionally, mesh-related complications, such as erosion or infection, may necessitate surgical removal of the implant [246].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 242– 50. 21252735
  2. [2]Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 235 e1– 8. 20494332
  3. [3]Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 891– 8. 18378748
  4. [4]Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C. Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group. Anterior Colporrhaphy versus Transvaginal Mesh for Pelvic-Organ Prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1826– 36. 21561348
  5. [5]Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 367– 73. 19155908
  6. [6]Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 2009; 116: 15– 24. 19087076
  7. [9]Junge K, Binnebösel M, von Trotha KT Mesh Biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodeling. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012; 397: 255– 70. 21455703
  8. [10]Brown BN, Mani D, Nolfi AL, Liang R, Abramowitch S, Moalli PA. Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 668.e1– 668.e10. 26259906 PMC4631685
  9. [11]Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 206.e1– e8. 27094962 PMC5201165
  10. [12]Liang R, Abramowitch S, Knight K, Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness. BJOG. 2013; 120: 233– 43. 23240802 PMC3531826
  11. [13]Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG. 2013; 120: 224– 32. 23240801 PMC3530836
  12. [14]Julier Z, Park AJ, Briquez PS, Martino MM. Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system. Acta Biomater. 2017 4 15; 53: 13– 28. 28119112
  13. [15]Brodbeck WG, Macewan M, Colton E, Meyerson H, Anderson JM. Lymphocytes and the foreign body response: lymphocyte enhancement of macrophage adhesion and fusion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005; 74: 222– 9. 15948198
  14. [16]Chang DT, Jones JA, Meyerson H, Lymphocyte/Macrophage Interactions: Biomaterial Surface-Dependent Cytokine, Chemokine, and Matrix Protein Production. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 87: 10. PMC3867010 18200554
  15. [17]Rodriguez A, MacEwan M, Colton E, Meyerson H, Anderson JM. Evaluation of Clinical Biomaterial Surface Effects on T Lymphocyte Activation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 92: 214– 20. 19172618 PMC2788042
  16. [18]Rodriguez A, MacEwan SR, Meyerson H, Kirk JT, Anderson JM. The Foreign Body Reaction in T cell deficient mice. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009; 90: 10. PMC3864678 18491378
  17. [19]Wick G, Grundtman C, Mayerl C The Immunology of Fibrosis. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2013; 31: 107– 35. 23516981
  18. [20]Wick G, Backovic A, Rabensteiner E The immunology of fibrosis: innate and adaptive responses. Trends Immunol. 2010; 31(3): 110– 119. 20106721 PMC3292796
  19. [21]Duffield JS, Lupher M, Thannickal VJ, Wynn TA. Host Responses in Tissue Repair and Fibrosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013; 8: 241– 76. 23092186 PMC3789589
  20. [22]Wynn TA. Type 2 cytokines: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Nat Review Immunol. 2015; 15: 271– 82. 25882242
  21. [23]Borges LF, Gutierres PS, Marana HR, Taboga SR. Picrosirius-polarization staining method as an efficient histopathological tool for collagenolysis detection in vesical prolapse lesions. Micron. 2007; 38: 580– 3. 17126553
  22. [24]Pierard GE. Sirius Red Polarization Method is Useful to Visualize the Organization of Connective Tissues but not the Molecular Composition of their Fibrous Polymers. Matrix. 1989; 9: 68– 71. 2710035
  23. [25]Sykes B, Puddle B, Francis M, Smith R. The estimation of two collagens from human dermis by interrupted gel electrophoresis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1976; 72: 1472– 80. 793589
  24. [26]Corry DB, Kiss A, Song LZ Overlapping and independent contributions of MMP2 and MMP9 to lung allergic inflammatory cell egression through decreased CC chemokines. FASEB J. 2004; 6 18: 995– 7. 15059974 PMC2771179

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tennyson, L., Rytel, M., Palcsey, S., Meyn, L., Liang, R., & Moalli, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Magee-Womens Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Moalli, Pamela
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
220
Issue
2
Pages
187.e1-187.e8
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899956132
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD061811)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
polypropylene mesh, mesh complications, pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, T cell response, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, regulatory T cells, T helper cells, mesh exposure, fibrosis, collagen deposition, type I collagen, type III collagen, TGF-beta, connective tissue growth factor
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Collagen, Female, Foreign-Body Migration, Foreign-Body Reaction, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Pain, Polypropylenes, Surgical Mesh, T-Lymphocytes, Biomarkers, Linear Models, Device Removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review