Evidence-based guidelines for the management of abnormally invasive placenta: recommendations from the International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta
Open accessAbstract
The worldwide incidence of abnormally invasive placenta is rapidly rising, following the trend of increasing cesarean delivery. It is a heterogeneous condition and has a high maternal morbidity and mortality rate, presenting specific intrapartum challenges. Its rarity makes developing individual expertise difficult for the majority of clinicians. The International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta aims to improve clinicians' understanding and skills in managing this difficult condition. By pooling knowledge, experience, and expertise gained within a variety of different healthcare systems, the Society seeks to improve the outcomes for women with abnormally invasive placenta globally. The recommendations presented herewith were reached using a modified Delphi technique and are based on the best available evidence. The evidence base for each is presented using a formal grading system. The topics chosen address the most pertinent questions regarding intrapartum management of abnormally invasive placenta with respect to clinically relevant outcomes, including the following: definition of a center of excellence; requirement for antenatal hospitalization; antenatal optimization of hemoglobin; gestational age for delivery; antenatal corticosteroid administration; use of preoperative cystoscopy, ureteric stents, and prophylactic pelvic arterial balloon catheters; maternal position for surgery; type of skin incision; position of the uterine incision; use of interoperative ultrasound; prophylactic administration of oxytocin; optimal method for intraoperative diagnosis; use of expectant management; adjuvant therapies for expectant management; use of local surgical resection; type of hysterectomy; use of delayed hysterectomy; intraoperative measures to treat life-threatening hemorrhage; and fertility after conservative management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 350
- Authors
- Collins, S. L., Alemdar, B., van Beekhuizen, H. J., Bertholdt, C., Braun, T., Calda, P., Delorme, P., Duvekot, J. J., Gronbeck, L., Kayem, G., Langhoff-Roos, J., Marcellin, L., Martinelli, P., Morel, O., Mhallem, M., Morlando, M., Noergaard, L. N., Nonnenmacher, A., Pateisky, P., Petit, P., Rijken, M. J., Ropacka-Lesiak, M., Schlembach, D., Sentilhes, L., Stefanovic, V., Strindfors, G., Tutschek, B., Vangen, S., Weichert, A., Weizsäcker, K., & Chantraine, F.
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Hôpital Cochin (FR)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Hôpital Armand-Trousseau (FR)
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Liège (BE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Collins, Sally L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 511-526
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2920932433
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 40.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.eur.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (VFN, 64165, (RVO-VFN 64165))
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Keywords
- abnormally invasive placenta, placenta accreta spectrum, intrapartum management, cesarean section, gestational age at delivery, antenatal corticosteroids, ureteral stent, hysterectomy, expectant management, maternal morbidity and mortality, surgical resection
- MeSH terms
- Conservative Treatment, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Cesarean Section, Delphi Technique, Female, Gestational Age, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Humans, Hysterectomy, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Ureter, Stents, Disease Management, Patient Positioning, Watchful Waiting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review