Cited by 18Surgical site infection preventionInfection Control in HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Study to Reduce Infection Prior to Elective Cesarean Deliveries (STRIPES): a randomized clinical trial of chlorhexidine

Open access
Stone, Joanne, Bianco, Angela, Monro, Johanna, Overybey, Jessica R., Cadet, Julie, Choi, Katie Hyewon, Pena, Juan, Robles, Brittany N. +3 more·2020·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery are a source of maternal morbidity and usually due to skin microbial flora. Preadmission application of chlorhexidine gluconate via impregnated cloths may decrease surgical site infections by decreasing the abundance of microbial flora. OBJECTIVE(S) To determine if the application of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloths the night before and morning of scheduled cesarean delivery decreases the risk of surgical site infections by 6 weeks post-operatively compared to placebo cloths. STUDY DESIGN In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Sage 2% chlorhexidine cloths or Sage Comfort Bath fragrance-free cloths (placebo) to apply to 6 skin sites on the body (neck/shoulders/chest, arm pits/arms/hands, abdomen/groin, left leg/foot, right leg/foot, back/buttocks) the night before and after a shower the morning of scheduled cesarean delivery. Routine clinical and operative procedures were followed. The primary outcome was surgical site infections (superficial or deep -incisional and/or organ space-endometritis) by 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. The secondary outcomes were surgical site infections by 2 weeks and other wound-related complications by 2 and 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. RESULTS From April 2015 through August 2019, 1,356 patients were enrolled: 682 were assigned to the chlorhexidine group and 674 to the placebo group. The groups were similar in demographic and medical characteristics. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up prior to cesarean delivery (10 in chlorhexidine and 4 in placebo) and 33 were lost to follow-up after cesarean delivery (10 in chlorhexidine and 23 in placebo). Among the remaining 1309 (97%), no difference was found in surgical site infections by 6 weeks between the groups (2.6% in chlorhexidine vs. 3.7% in placebo, P=0.24). There were no differences in secondary outcomes at 2 or 6 weeks, and no differences in primary outcome in a per-protocol analysis Conclusion(s): Pre-admission use of chlorhexidine gluconate cloths compared to placebo does not result in a reduction in surgical site infection after scheduled cesarean deliveries. Patients and physicians who follow the standard of care guidelines have a low risk of surgical site infections in this group of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [33]33. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of infection after gy- necologic procedures. Available at: https:// www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice- bulletin/articles/2018/06/prevention-of-infection- after-gynecologic-procedures. Accessed June 12, 2020.
  2. [38]38. Fields AC, Pradarelli JC, Itani KMF. Pre- venting surgical site infections: looking Original Research OBSTETRICS ajog.org Beyond the current guidelines. JAMA 2020;323: 1087-8.

Authors
Stone, J., Bianco, A., Monro, J., Overybey, J. R., Cadet, J., Choi, K. H., Pena, J., Robles, B. N., Mella, M. T., Matthews, K. C., & Factor, S. H.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, Joanne
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
113.e1-113.e11
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025258580
Cited by
18
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-11-01)
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR001434)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
chlorhexidine gluconate, surgical site infection, cesarean section, preoperative skin antisepsis, endometritis, wound complications, maternal morbidity, prophylaxis
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Adult, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Cesarean Section, Chlorhexidine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Preoperative Care, Surgical Wound Infection, Elective Surgical Procedures, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review