The modified radical peripartum cesarean hysterectomy (Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique): a systematic, safe procedure for the management of severe placenta accreta spectrum
Abstract
Background The prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum is rising worldwide. The severe end of the spectrum where the placenta has invaded other organs is fortunately rare, however, few surgical techniques for such a complex hysterectomy have been described in the literature.Objective This study aimed to describe a stepwise, systematic technique for radical cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum to investigate outcomes for women with severe, invasive placenta accreta spectrum who were hysterectomized using this technique.Study design This was a retrospective cohort study undertaken at a large UK tertiary referral center. A total of 24 cases of elective primary cesarean hysterectomy with a confirmed intrapartum diagnosis of severe percreta (Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grades 3b and 3c) were identified between 2011 and 2020. Among those cases, 16 had standard care (surgical technique dependent on surgeon's preference), and 8 had a radical peripartum hysterectomy using the Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique as described. Nonparametric testing was used because of sample size.Results The Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique resulted in significantly less blood loss (P=.032), more transverse incisions (P=.009), and less intensive care unit admissions (P=.046). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in theater time.Conclusion The Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique demonstrated a significant improvement in outcomes for women with severe placenta accreta spectrum, without increasing surgical time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women who had modified radical peripartum caesarean hysterectomy conducted by highly skilled and experienced surgical teams had better outcomes compared with normal surgical approaches; accordingly, the experience and skill set of the surgical team matters.
“Colleagues have shown that women who had modified radical peripartum caesarean hysterectomy conducted by highly skilled and experienced surgical teams had better outcomes compared with normal surgical approaches; accordingly, the experience and skill set of the surgical team matters.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Soleymani majd, H., Collins, S. L., Addley, S., Weeks, E., Chakravarti, S., Halder, S., & Alazzam, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175.e1-175.e10
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3137003429
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2023-06-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Keywords
- placenta accreta spectrum, peripartum hysterectomy, surgical technique, blood loss, intensive care unit admission, operative time
- MeSH terms
- Surgical Oncology, Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Intensive Care Units, Placenta Accreta, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Blood Loss, Surgical, Operative Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review