Cited by 48Maternal and fetal healthcareUterine Myomas and TreatmentsBlood transfusion and management

The modified radical peripartum cesarean hysterectomy (Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique): a systematic, safe procedure for the management of severe placenta accreta spectrum

Soleymani majd, Hooman, Collins, Sally L., Addley, Susan, Weeks, Esme, Chakravarti, Sujay, Halder, Sunil, Alazzam, Móiad·2021·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Background The prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum is rising worldwide. The severe end of the spectrum where the placenta has invaded other organs is fortunately rare, however, few surgical techniques for such a complex hysterectomy have been described in the literature.Objective This study aimed to describe a stepwise, systematic technique for radical cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum to investigate outcomes for women with severe, invasive placenta accreta spectrum who were hysterectomized using this technique.Study design This was a retrospective cohort study undertaken at a large UK tertiary referral center. A total of 24 cases of elective primary cesarean hysterectomy with a confirmed intrapartum diagnosis of severe percreta (Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grades 3b and 3c) were identified between 2011 and 2020. Among those cases, 16 had standard care (surgical technique dependent on surgeon's preference), and 8 had a radical peripartum hysterectomy using the Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique as described. Nonparametric testing was used because of sample size.Results The Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique resulted in significantly less blood loss (P=.032), more transverse incisions (P=.009), and less intensive care unit admissions (P=.046). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in theater time.Conclusion The Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique demonstrated a significant improvement in outcomes for women with severe placenta accreta spectrum, without increasing surgical time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 48

Authors
Soleymani majd, H., Collins, S. L., Addley, S., Weeks, E., Chakravarti, S., Halder, S., & Alazzam, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
225
Issue
2
Pages
175.e1-175.e10
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137003429
Cited by
48
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2023-06-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
placenta accreta spectrum, peripartum hysterectomy, surgical technique, blood loss, intensive care unit admission, operative time
MeSH terms
Surgical Oncology, Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Intensive Care Units, Placenta Accreta, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Blood Loss, Surgical, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review