Mobilizing the fourth trimester to improve population health: interventions for postpartum transitions of care
Abstract
Birthing people in the United States, particularly those from marginalized communities, experience an unexpectedly high rate of morbidity and mortality. Optimal postpartum care is an opportunity to address immediate maternal health concerns while providing a connection to further high-value primary care. However, postpartum care in the United States is fragmented and incomplete. In response to this failure, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has called for obstetricians to develop individualized care plans that facilitate transitions from obstetrical to primary care after delivery. In this clinical opinion, we review previous interventions that have aimed to increase postpartum care engagement and bridge gaps in care. Although numerous interventions have been trialed, few have been both successful and scalable. We provide recommendations on ways to reimagine equitable and effective postpartum care interventions with multidisciplinary collaboration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Postpartum care is often overlooked in maternity care.
“Despite its importance, this stage is often overlooked in maternity care (Phillips et al., 2023).”
From Extending the continuum: Mapping post-6-week nurse/midwife-led interventions for postnatal women – A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as Phillips et al., 2023
Ending routine maternity care at 6 weeks postpartum is increasingly viewed as insufficient to meet the complex health needs of new mothers.
“Ending routine maternity care at 6 weeks postpartum is increasingly viewed as insufficient to meet the complex health needs of new mothers (Phillips et al., 2023).”
From Extending the continuum: Mapping post-6-week nurse/midwife-led interventions for postnatal women – A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as Phillips et al., 2023
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Phillips, S. E. K., Celi, A. C., Wehbe, A., Kaduthodil, J., & Zera, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phillips, Sara E.K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-38
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312204759
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Resources and Services Administration (T76MC00001)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum care, care transitions, fourth trimester, maternal health, primary care continuity, care fragmentation, marginalized communities, health equity, multidisciplinary collaboration, individualized care plans
- MeSH terms
- Maternal Health, Population Health, Female, Humans, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimesters, United States, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review