The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pandemic-related pregnancy stress and anxiety among women pregnant during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Stress regarding birth preparations and COVID-19 infection risk are linked to elevated anxiety during pregnancy [18].”
From Prenatal distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical and research implications (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Emotional social support [18], along with interpersonal characteristics such as relationship satisfaction or better rapport with one’s mother during pregnancy is associated with lower pregnancy-specific distress [19].”
From Prenatal distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical and research implications (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“High risk pregnancy (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19), abuse history (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.24–2.75), and pandemic-related stress surrounding birth preparedness (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.35–2.26) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.28–1.88), were predictive of higher levels of anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“High risk pregnancy (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19), abuse history (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.24–2.75), and pandemic-related stress surrounding birth preparedness (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.35–2.26) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.28–1.88), were predictive of higher levels of anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“A survey of pregnant women in May 2020 showed that the prevalence of anxiety was 78.9%, with 21.7% of those surveyed experiencing severe anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“High risk pregnancy (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19), abuse history (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.24–2.75), and pandemic-related stress surrounding birth preparedness (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.35–2.26) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.28–1.88), were predictive of higher levels of anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“A survey of pregnant women in May 2020 showed that the prevalence of anxiety was 78.9%, with 21.7% of those surveyed experiencing severe anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“High risk pregnancy (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19), abuse history (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.24–2.75), and pandemic-related stress surrounding birth preparedness (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.35–2.26) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.28–1.88), were predictive of higher levels of anxiety (Preis et al., 2020).”
From Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review (2020) · cites this paper as Preis et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological impact of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women
Saccone, G., Florio, A., Aiello, F. S., Venturella, R., Angelis, M. C. D., Locci, M., Bifulco, G., Zullo, F., & Sardo, A. D. S. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.003 · Cited by 442
Disasters and Perinatal Health: A Systematic Review
Harville, E. W., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. M. (2010) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e31820eddbe · Cited by 383
Ibrahim, S. M., & Lobel, M. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-019-00068-7 · Cited by 117
Self-citationAbdoli, A., Falahi, S., Kenarkoohi, A., Shams, M., Mir, H., & Jahromi, M. A. M. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1080/0167482x.2020.1761321 · Cited by 69
Preis, H., Inman, E. M., & Lobel, M. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000675 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Connor, J., Madhavan, S., Mokashi, M., Amanuel, H., Johnson, N. R., Pace, L. E., & Bartz, D. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113364 · Cited by 555
Wang, Y., Kala, M. P., & Jafar, T. H. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244630 · Cited by 382
Preis, H., Mahaffey, B., Heiselman, C., & Lobel, M. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113348 · Cited by 302
Self-citationYan, H., Ding, Y., & Guo, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617001 · Cited by 283
Karavadra, B., Stöckl, A., Prosser‐Snelling, E., Simpson, P. D., & Morris, E. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03283-2 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Preis, H., Mahaffey, B., Heiselman, C., & Lobel, M.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Preis, Heidi
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 100155
- ISSN
- 2589-9333 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7295479
- OpenAlex
- W3035444307
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 27.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stony Brook University
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD092888)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, pregnancy, maternal stress, prenatal anxiety, maternal mental health, social distancing, unemployment, intimate partner violence, preterm birth, low birth weight, offspring outcomes
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Financial Stress, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, New York, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Brief, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Needs Assessment, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
