Cited by 12Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Involuntary admission and treatment experiences of persons with schizophrenia: Implication for the Mental Health Care Bill 2016

Gowda, Guru S., Kondapuram, Nithin, Kumar, Channaveerachari Naveen, Math, Suresh Bada·2017·Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Involuntary admission and treatment experiences may affect the attitude of patients toward subsequent treatment and further outcomes. This issue has received relatively less research attention in persons with schizophrenia from developing countries.Methodology In this hospital based prospective observational study, involuntary admission, treatment and coercion experiences among 76 persons with schizophrenia, admitted under special circumstances of Mental Health Act -1987 were studied. Demographic, clinical and assessments related to coercion experiences were completed within 3days of admission. In 67 subjects, a reassessment was done just before discharge.Results Mean (SD) age was 33.1 (±11.5) years, 47.8% (n=32) were males and 32.8% (n=22) were married. 92.5% (n=62) had absent insight at admission. Mean CGI Severity score at admission was 6.27 (±0.53). Mean (SD) score on MacArthur Perceived Coercion Scale at admission was 4.04 (±1.61). This reduced to 2.43(±1.91) [p<0.001]. This reduction correlated significantly with improvements in global functioning (r=-0.40, p <0.001), insight level(r=0.26, p<0.001) and as well as symptom severity(r=0.36, p<0.001). At discharge, 70% (n=47) patients reported that their involuntary admission was justified.Conclusion Perceived coercion in schizophrenia though common clinical phenomena, it is a dynamic state which reduces over course of treatment. At Discharge, majority reported that their admission was justified, even though they were admitted involuntarily. The study underlines the need for a standardized rule of conduct based coercive practice in psychiatry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.04.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 12

Authors
Gowda, G. S., Kondapuram, N., Kumar, C. N., & Math, S. B.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Gowda, Guru S.
Venue
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
29
Pages
3-7
ISSN
1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605420677
Cited by
12
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
schizophrenia, involuntary admission, involuntary treatment, perceived coercion, insight, global functioning, symptom severity, developing countries
MeSH terms
Adult, Coercion, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Health Policy, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review