Cited by 27Immune Response and InflammationImmunotoxicology and immune responsesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Discordant biological and toxicological species responses to TLR3 activation

Open access
Mitchell, William M., Nicodemus, Christopher F., Carter, William A., Horvath, Joseph C., Strayer, David R.·2014·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are highly conserved type 1 membrane proteins that initiate a multiplicity of transient gene transcriptions, resulting in innate and adaptive immune responses. These essential immune responses are triggered by common TLR pattern recognition receptors of microbial products expressed through the cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal Toll/IL-1 domain. Toll/IL-1 adapter protein cascades are induced by an activated Toll/IL-1 to induce transient transcription responses. All TLRs, with the exception of TLR3, use an MyD88 adapter to Toll/IL-1 to initiate a proinflammatory cascade. TLR3 uses the toll receptor 3/4 induction factor adapter to initiate a different cytosolic adapter cascade with double-stranded RNA agonists. This non-MyD88 pathway induces both NF-κB and type 1 interferon responses. By using a TLR3-restricted double-stranded RNA agonist, rintatolimod, we demonstrate significant unexpected differences in toxic responses between rats and primates. The mechanism of this differential response is consistent with a relative down-regulation of the NF-κB inflammatory cytokine induction pathway in the cynomolgus monkey and humans, but not observed systemically in rat. Our findings suggest evaluation of TLR3 agonists in drug therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 27

Authors
Mitchell, W. M., Nicodemus, C. F., Carter, W. A., Horvath, J. C., & Strayer, D. R.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, William M.
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
184
Issue
4
Pages
1062-1072
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142563310
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
TLR3, species differences in toxicity, Macaca fascicularis, NF-κB signaling, type I interferon, MyD88-independent pathway, innate immunity, drug safety assessment
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Dogs, Humans, Inflammation, Macaca fascicularis, Molecular Sequence Data, Poly I-C, Poly U, Rabbits, Species Specificity, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Toll-Like Receptor 3, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review