Combined Systemic Disruption of MET and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Causes Liver Failure in Normal Mice
Open accessAbstract
MET and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinases are crucial for liver regeneration and normal hepatocyte function. Recently, we demonstrated that in mice, combined inhibition of these two signaling pathways abolished liver regeneration after hepatectomy, with subsequent hepatic failure and death at 15 to 18 days after resection. Morbidity was associated with distinct and specific alterations in important downstream signaling pathways that led to decreased hepatocyte volume, reduced proliferation, and shutdown of many essential hepatocyte functions, such as fatty acid synthesis, urea cycle, and mitochondrial functions. Herein, we explore the role of MET and EGFR signaling in resting mouse livers that are not subjected to hepatectomy. Mice with combined disruption of MET and EGFR signaling were noticeably sick by 10 days and died at 12 to 14 days. Mice with combined disruption of MET and EGFR signaling mice showed decreased liver/body weight ratios, increased apoptosis in nonparenchymal cells, impaired liver metabolic functions, and activation of distinct downstream signaling pathways related to inflammation, cell death, and survival. The present study demonstrates that, in addition to controlling the regenerative response, MET and EGFR synergistically control baseline liver homeostasis in normal mice in such a way that their combined disruption leads to liver failure and death.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MET or EGFR signalling alone can compensate for one another, but blocking both results in deficient liver regeneration and animal death after partial hepatectomy.
“While MET or EGFR signalling alone can compensate for one another, blocking both signalling pathways results in deficient liver regeneration, with respect to original liver mass, and animal death after partial hepatectomy.[127], [128], [129]”
From Distinct hepatocyte identities in liver homeostasis and regeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
The paper's opening summary reports that combined MET and EGFR inhibition abolished regeneration after hepatectomy and led to liver failure and death 15–18 days later. Its Results show that mice with either pathway disrupted alone maintained liver/body weight ratios in the resting-liver experiment, but do not establish that the pathways compensate for one another during regeneration after hepatectomy or address recovery of the original liver mass. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Wu J, Chen W, Xia G, Zhang J, Shao J, Tan B, Zhang C, Yu W, Weng Q, Liu H, Hu M, Deng H, Hao Y, Shen J, Yu Y: Design, syn- thesis, and biological evaluation of novel conformationally constrained inhibitors targeting EGFR. ACS Med Chem Lett 2013, 4:974e978
- Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; National Research Council: Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: Eighth Edition. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2011
- Bale SS, Geerts S, Jindal R, Yarmush ML: Isolation and co-culture of rat parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells to evaluate cellular interactions and response. Sci Rep 2016, 6:25329
- Nejak-Bowen K, Orr A, Bowen WC Jr, Michalopoulos GK: Condi- tional genetic elimination of hepatocyte growth factor in mice com- promises liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. PLoS One 2013, 8:e59836
- Authors
- Tsagianni, A., Mars, W. M., Bhushan, B., Bowen, W. C., Orr, A., Stoops, J., Paranjpe, S., Tseng, G. C., Liu, S., & Michalopoulos, G. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Michalopoulos, George K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2223-2235
- ISSN
- 0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6168971
- OpenAlex
- W2884486737
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P01 DK096690)
- Cleveland Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- C-MET signaling, epidermal growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibition, liver failure, liver homeostasis, hepatocyte proliferation, apoptosis, non-parenchymal cells, liver regeneration, hepatectomy, fatty acid synthesis, urea cycle, mitochondrial function, inflammation, cell death, cell survival, mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Liver Regeneration, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Morpholines, Organ Size, Liver Failure, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Hepatocytes, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review