Expression of LRIG1, a Negative Regulator of EGFR, Is Dynamically Altered during Different Stages of Gastric Carcinogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains (LRIG)-1 is a transmembrane protein that antagonizes epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in epithelial tissues. LRIG1 is down-regulated in various epithelial cancers, including bladder, breast, and colorectal cancer, suggesting that it functions as a tumor suppressor. However, its role in gastric carcinogenesis is not well understood. Here, we investigated the changes in LRIG1 expression during the stages of gastric cancer. We used a DMP-777-induced spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia mouse model and a tissue array of human gastric cancer lesions. The effects of LRIG1 knockdown were also assessed using the human gastric cancer cell line SNU638 in a xenograft model. LRIG1 expression varied over the course of gastric carcinogenesis, increasing in spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia lesions but disappearing in intestinal metaplasia and cancer lesions, and the increase was concurrent with the up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor. In addition, LRIG1 knockdown promoted the tumorigenic potential in vitro, which was manifested as increased proliferation, invasiveness, and migration as well as increased tumor size in vivo in the xenograft model. Furthermore, LRIG1 expression was determined to be a positive prognostic biomarker for the survival of gastric cancer patients. Collectively, our findings indicate that LRIG1 expression is closely related wto gastric carcinogenesis and may play a vital role as a tumor suppressor through the modulation of epidermal growth factor receptor activity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depletion of tumor suppressor LRIG1 was identified as the top hit contributing to increased cell proliferation.
“Notably, the depletion of tumor suppressor LRIG1, a negative regulator of ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases40–42, was identified as the top hit contributing to increased cell proliferation (Fig. 1D).”
From Large-scale CRISPR screening in primary human 3D gastric organoids enables comprehensive dissection of gene-drug interactions (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wang, Y., Shi, C., Lu, Y., Poulin, E. J., Franklin, J. L., & Coffey, R. J. (2015) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.12.014 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lo, Y.-H., Horn, H. T., Huang, M.-F., Yu, W.-C., Young, C.-M., Liu, Q., Tomaske, M., Towers, M., Dominguez, A., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62818-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Notably, the depletion of tumor suppressor LRIG1 , a negative regulator of ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases 40 – 42 , was identi fi ed as the top hit contributing to increased cell proliferation (Fig.”
- Authors
- Yu, S., Yang, M., Lim, K.-M., Cho, Y., Kim, H., Lee, K., Jeong, S.-H., Coffey, R. J., Goldenring, J. R., & Nam, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- Hallym University (KR)
- Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital (KR)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nam, Ki Taek
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2912-2923
- ISSN
- 0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6334257
- OpenAlex
- W2893328172
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2018R1A5A2025286, NRF-2017M3A9F3041234, NRF-2017R1A2B2009850)
- Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2015-0163)
- Yonsei University
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- National Institutes of Health (RO1 DK071590)
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2015R1C1A2A01053575)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX000930)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mechanisms of cancer metastasis
- Keywords
- Lrig1, gastric carcinogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor, tumor suppressor, SPEM, intestinal metaplasia, gastric cancer, prognostic factors, tumorigenicity, cell proliferation and invasion, xenograft models
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Metaplasia, Mice, Nude, Neoplasm Staging, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Stomach, Stomach Neoplasms, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Rate, Case-Control Studies, Apoptosis, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Proliferation, Mice, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review