Cited by 382AI in cancer detectionMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesCell Image Analysis Techniques

Pathology image analysis using segmentation deep learning algorithms

Open access
Wang, Shidan, Yang, Donghan M., Rong, Ruichen, Zhan, Xiaowei, Xiao, Guanghua·2019·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

With the rapid development of image scanning techniques and visualization software, whole slide imaging (WSI) is becoming a routine diagnostic method. Accelerating clinical diagnosis from pathology images and automating image analysis efficiently and accurately remain significant challenges. Recently, deep learning algorithms have shown great promise in pathology image analysis, such as in tumor region identification, metastasis detection, and patient prognosis. Many machine learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks, have been proposed to automatically segment pathology images. Among these algorithms, segmentation deep learning algorithms such as fully convolutional networks stand out for their accuracy, computational efficiency, and generalizability. Thus, deep learning-based pathology image segmentation has become an important tool in WSI analysis. In this review, the pathology image segmentation process using deep learning algorithms is described in detail. The goals are to provide quick guidance for implementing deep learning into pathology image analysis and to provide some potential ways of further improving segmentation performance. Although there have been previous reviews on using machine learning methods in digital pathology image analysis, this is the first in-depth review of the applications of deep learning algorithms for segmentation in WSI analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 382

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. He KM, Gkioxari G, Dollar P, Girshick R: Mask R-CNN. Edited by Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2017. pp. 2980e2988
  2. Huang G, Liu Z, van der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ: Densely con- nected convolutional networks. Edited by Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2017. pp. 2261e2269
  3. Girshick R: Fast R-CNN. Edited by Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2015. pp. 1440e1448

Authors
Wang, S., Yang, D. M., Rong, R., Zhan, X., & Xiao, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhan, Xiaowei
  • Xiao, Guanghua
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
189
Issue
9
Pages
1686-1698
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952846726
Cited by
382
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01CA172211, 1R01GM115473, 5P30CA142543, 5R01CA152301)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP120732)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
whole slide imaging, digital pathology, deep learning, fully convolutional network, metastasis detection, convolutional neural networks, automated image analysis
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pathology, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review