Cited by 54Algal biology and biofuel productionBiofuel production and bioconversionThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Impact of biochemical composition on susceptibility of algal biomass to acid-catalyzed pretreatment for sugar and lipid recovery

Open access
Dong, T., Van Wychen, S., Nagle, N., Pienkos, P.T., Laurens, L.M.L.·2016·Algal Research

Abstract

One of the major challenges associated with algal biofuels production in a biorefinery-type setting is improving biomass utilization in its entirety, increasing the process energetic yields and providing economically viable and scalable co-product concepts. We focus on the impact of compositional characteristics of biomass on the susceptibility to pretreatment in order to maximize the valorization of algal biomass conversion for biofuels and bioproducts. The release of monomeric carbohydrates in the aqueous phase and extractability of the lipid fraction was measured based a response surface methodology to find significant explanatory variables and interaction terms. We studied the effect of harvest timing on the conversion yields, using three algal strains; Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acutus and Nannochloropsis granulata representing three different nutritional metabolic phases. Four cultivation conditions of high (≥ 90 gallon gasoline equivalent/ton biomass) value for a combined sugar- and lipid-based biofuels process were identified. These four conditions represent either mid or late stage harvest cultivation regimes. The results indicate that acid pretreatment has potential to be applicable for a vast range of biomass samples to obtain high energy yields, but that the exact conditions and optima are dependent on the strain and likely the starting composition of the biomass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 54

Authors
Dong, T., Van Wychen, S., Nagle, N., Pienkos, P. T., & Laurens, L. M. L.
Affiliations
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Corresponding author
Laurens, L.M.L.
Venue
Algal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
18
Pages
69-77
ISSN
2211-9264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2412799795
Cited by
54
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Algal Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC36-08-GO28308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
algal biomass, biochemical composition, sugar recovery, lipid extraction, algal biofuels, biorefinery, harvest time, Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus acutus, carbohydrate release, energy yield, growth conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review