Cited by 229Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Changes in incidence of diabetes in U.S. adults, 1997–2003

Geiss, Linda S., Pan, Liping, Cadwell, Betsy, Gregg, Edward W., Benjamin, Stephanie M., Engelgau, Michael M.·2006·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background The incidence of self-reported diagnosed diabetes may be increasing because of recent changes in the diagnostic criteria for diabetes, enhanced case detection, and a true increase in disease incidence. These factors may also be changing the characteristics of newly diagnosed cases. Therefore, we examined recent trends in the incidence of diagnosed diabetes, changes to the characteristics of incident cases, and factors associated with incidence. Methods First, National Health Interview Survey data for 1997 to 2003 were used to examine 7-year trends in the incidence of diagnosed diabetes among U.S. adults aged 18 to 79 years. Second, among 1997-1998 and 2002-2003 incident cases, differences in sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors, and indicators of health status were examined. Lastly, multivariate-adjusted incidence from multiple logistic regression of 2001-2003 survey data were derived. Results From 1997 to 2003, the incidence of diagnosed diabetes increased 41% from 4.9 to 6.9 per 1,000 population (p Conclusions Obesity was a major factor in the recent increase of newly diagnosed diabetes. Lifestyle interventions that reduce or prevent the prevalence of obesity among persons at risk for diabetes are needed to halt the increasing incidence of diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 5-year cumulative incidence of diabetes in people with A1C 5.5-6.0% is three- to eightfold higher than incidence in the U.S. population as a whole.

    “Prospective studies indicate that people within the A1C range of 5.5–6.0% have a 5-year cumulative incidence of diabetes that ranges from 12 to 25% (4–7), which is appreciably (three- to eightfold) higher than incidence in the U.S. population as a whole (8).”

    From Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 229

Authors
Geiss, L. S., Pan, L., Cadwell, B., Gregg, E. W., Benjamin, S. M., & Engelgau, M. M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
371-377
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077464591
Cited by
229
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
diabetes incidence, type 2 diabetes, obesity, risk factors, sociodemographic factors, physical activity, physical limitations, body mass index, educational attainment, sex differences, lifestyle intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Population Surveillance, United States, Incidence, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review