Pedometer-Measured Physical Activity Patterns of Youth
Abstract
Context Insufficient physical activity among young people aged 5-18 years is a global public health issue, with considerable disparities among countries. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting pedometer daily steps (steps x day(-1)) in order to compile comparative, global cross-sectional data on youth physical activity patterns. Evidence acquisition Articles were included if they were in English, published by April 2009, and reported steps x day(-1) for boys and girls, separately, and reported steps x day(-1) for age groupings of no more than 4 years (e.g., 5-8 years) or combined no more than three grade levels (e.g., third- to fifth-graders). Studies could have been intervention-based but had to have reported baseline steps x day(-1), which would reflect unadulterated physical activity steps x day(-1) estimates. Inverse variance weighted estimates (steps x day(-1w)) were calculated for each country, and random effects models were estimated. Analyses were conducted in May and June 2009. Evidence synthesis Forty-three studies, representing young people in 13 countries (N=14,200), were included. The majority of studies were from the U.S. (17/43). Overall, there was considerable variation within and among countries in steps x day(-1w). Boys and girls from European and Western Pacific regions had significantly more steps x day(-1w) than young people from the U.S. and Canada. Significantly lower steps x day(-1w) estimates for girls were observed for studie…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on convenience samples of children in 13 countries found that children typically have higher mean daily step counts than adults.
“Studies on convenience samples of children in 13 countries have found that they typically have higher mean daily step counts than adults [60].”
From Step Counting: A Review of Measurement Considerations and Health-Related Applications (2017) · cites this paper as [60]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 84 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Beets, M. W., Bornstein, D., Beighle, A., Cardinal, B. J., & Morgan, C. F.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beets, Michael W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 208-216
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067716746
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Keywords
- children's physical activity, daily step count, pedometer-measured activity, sex differences in physical activity, children and adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Walking, Developed Countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review