Cited by 103Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSports and Physical Education Studies

Pedometer-Measured Physical Activity Patterns of Youth

Beets, Michael W., Bornstein, Daniel, Beighle, Aaron, Cardinal, Bradley J., Morgan, Charles F.·2010·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Context Insufficient physical activity among young people aged 5-18 years is a global public health issue, with considerable disparities among countries. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting pedometer daily steps (steps x day(-1)) in order to compile comparative, global cross-sectional data on youth physical activity patterns. Evidence acquisition Articles were included if they were in English, published by April 2009, and reported steps x day(-1) for boys and girls, separately, and reported steps x day(-1) for age groupings of no more than 4 years (e.g., 5-8 years) or combined no more than three grade levels (e.g., third- to fifth-graders). Studies could have been intervention-based but had to have reported baseline steps x day(-1), which would reflect unadulterated physical activity steps x day(-1) estimates. Inverse variance weighted estimates (steps x day(-1w)) were calculated for each country, and random effects models were estimated. Analyses were conducted in May and June 2009. Evidence synthesis Forty-three studies, representing young people in 13 countries (N=14,200), were included. The majority of studies were from the U.S. (17/43). Overall, there was considerable variation within and among countries in steps x day(-1w). Boys and girls from European and Western Pacific regions had significantly more steps x day(-1w) than young people from the U.S. and Canada. Significantly lower steps x day(-1w) estimates for girls were observed for studie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 84 · Cited by 103

Authors
Beets, M. W., Bornstein, D., Beighle, A., Cardinal, B. J., & Morgan, C. F.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Beets, Michael W.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
208-216
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067716746
Cited by
103
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
children's physical activity, daily step count, pedometer-measured activity, sex differences in physical activity, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Walking, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review