The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Power of Collaboration
Abstract
This is one of six short papers that describe additional innovations to help integrate public health into medical education; these were featured in the "Patients and Populations: Public Health in Medical Education" conference. They represent relatively new endeavors or curricular components that had not been explored in prior publications. Although evaluation data are lacking, it was considered to be of value to medical educators to share a brief description of the collaboration between the Division of Preventive, Occupational, and Aerospace Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics at Mayo Clinic to integrate a preventive medicine-public health curriculum into the pediatric residency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four curricula involved formal collaboration with a professional organization.
“In addition, four curricula involved formal collaboration with a professional organization, such as the state chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 43, 47, 56, 62”
From A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
The majority of included pediatric curricula were published after 2001 and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.
“the majority were published after and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.”
From A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
The Pediatrician’s Role in Community Pediatrics
Committee on Community Health Services (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2680 · Cited by 107
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Varkey, 2007, The basics of quality improvement in healthcare, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82, 735, 10.4065/82.6.735 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education
Howell, B. A., Kristal, R. B., Whitmire, L. R., Gentry, M., Rabin, T. L., & Rosenbaum, J. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Varkey, P., Billings, M. L., Matthews, G. A., & Voigt, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Varkey, Prathibha
- ORCID
- Voigt, Robert G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- S314-S316
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167917495
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U36CD319276)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Keywords
- pediatric residency, inter-agency cooperation, Mayo Clinic, curriculum development
- MeSH terms
- Cooperative Behavior, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Internship and Residency, Minnesota, Pediatrics, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
