The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sickle Cell Disease in Africa
Open accessAbstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is common throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa, affecting up to 3% of births in some parts of the continent. Nevertheless, it remains a low priority for many health ministries. The most common form of SCD is caused by homozygosity for the β-globin S gene mutation (SS disease). It is widely believed that this condition is associated with very high child mortality, but reliable contemporary data are lacking. We have reviewed available African data on mortality associated with SS disease from published and unpublished sources, with an emphasis on two types of studies: cross-sectional population surveys and cohort studies. We have concluded that, although current data are inadequate to support definitive statements, they are consistent with an early-life mortality of 50%-90% among children born in Africa with SS disease. Inclusion of SCD interventions in child survival policies and programs in Africa could benefit from more precise estimates of numbers of deaths among children with SCD. A simple, representative, and affordable approach to estimate SCD child mortality is to test blood specimens already collected through large population surveys targeting conditions such as HIV, malaria, and malnutrition, and covering children of varying ages. Thus, although there is enough evidence to justify investments in screening, prophylaxis, and treatment for African children with SCD, better data are needed to estimate the numbers of child deaths preventable by such interventions and their cost effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global distribution of the sickle cell gene and geographical confirmation of the malaria hypothesis
Piel, F. B., Patil, A. P., Howes, R. E., Nyangiri, O. A., Gething, P. W., Williams, T. N., Weatherall, D. J., & Hay, S. I. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1104 · Cited by 629
Self-citation
Cited by
Rees, D. C., Williams, T. N., & Gladwin, M. T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61029-x · Cited by 2,504
Self-citationPiel, F. B., Steinberg, M. H., & Rees, D. C. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1510865 · Cited by 1,488
Self-citationKato, G. J., Piel, F. B., Reid, C. D., Gaston, M. H., Ohene-Frempong, K., Krishnamurti, L., Smith, W. R., Panepinto, J. A., Weatherall, D. J., Costa, F. F., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.10 · Cited by 1,501
Self-citationThomson, A. M., McHugh, T. A., Oron, A. P., Teply, C., Lonberg, N., Vilchis Tella, V., Wilner, L. B., Fuller, K., Hagins, H., Aboagye, R. G., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Haematology · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00118-7 · Cited by 747
Self-citationPiel, F. B., Steinberg, M., & Rees, D. C. (2016) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.1056/nejmc1706325#sa6 · Cited by 659
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosse, S. D., Odame, I., Atrash, H. K., Amendah, D. D., Piel, F. B., & Williams, T. N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- S398-S405
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1763433851
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sickle Cell Disease in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.013
- The paper
- Grosse, S. D., Odame, I., Atrash, H. K., Amendah, D. D., Piel, F. B., & Williams, T. N. (2011). Sickle Cell Disease in Africa. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.