Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Circles of Tobacco Wisdom

Nadeau, Melanie, Blake, Norby, Poupart, John, Rhodes, Kristine, Forster, Jean L.·2012·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Circles of Tobacco Wisdom (CTW) was an elder-led, community-based project that aimed to enhance tobacco control in the American Indian community. Its goal was to provide elders with the knowledge, opportunities, and support to enable them to assume leadership of a tobacco control movement that was grounded in the ceremonial traditions of tobacco use. Purpose The purpose of this study was to test the effects of the pilot intervention on participants. Design The design of this pilot study intervention was a single group, pre-post comparison, with a pre-post survey, monthly check-ins, and a post-1-year focus group. Participants Twelve elders were included in the pre- and post-analyses. All twelve elders were women who self-identified as American Indian (mean age = 64). Intervention The CTW elders participated in monthly talking circles, quarterly learning sessions, and a post-1-year focus group, and took part in other learning, support, and community action opportunities. Data were collected from December 2008 through November 2009 and analyzed throughout the process. Main outcome measures American Indian Elders' tobacco-related knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and behaviors were measured while participating in the CTW project. Results Knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and behavior changes were seen with cigarette smoking, secondhand smoke, and ceremonial tobacco use and risk perception. After 6 months, the number of people the elders had talked with about tobacco incr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Forster, 2007, Patterns of tobacco use in a sample of American Indians in Minneapolis–St. Paul, Nicotine Tob Res, 9, S29, 10.1080/14622200601083434 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Struthers, 2004, Sacred tobacco use in Ojibwe communities, J Holist Nurs, 22, 209, 10.1177/0898010104266735 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dickson, 2000, Aboriginal grandmothers' experience with health promotion and participatory action research, Qual Health Res, 10, 188, 10.1177/104973200129118363 · DOI
  4. Moss, 2005, Strengthening American Indian nurse scientists training through tradition: partnering with elders, J Cult Divers, 12, 50
  5. Skye, 2002, Elders gathering for Native American youth: Continuing Native American traditions and curbing substance abuse in Native American youth, J Sociol Soc Welfare, 29, 117, 10.15453/0191-5096.2790 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nadeau, M., Blake, N., Poupart, J., Rhodes, K., & Forster, J. L.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
S222-S228
ISSN
0749-3797
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review