Cited by 90Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionHealth Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral Health and Interventions

From the Bench to Public Health

Neter, Efrat, Stein, Nili, Barnett-Griness, Ofra, Rennert, Gad, Hagoel, Lea·2014·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces mortality, yet screening adherence remains low. Purpose Enhancing FOBT adherence in a field experiment, using Implementation Intentions (II) technique. Design Participants were randomly assigned to a standard care group or to II experimental group. Setting/participants A test kit was mailed to 29,833 HMO-insured members in two waves in 2011. Inclusion criteria eligible persons aged 50-74 who underwent the test the year before. A sample of 2200 participants was interviewed over the telephone for possible cognitive and background moderators. Intervention Leaflet attached to the test kit containing an "if-then" condition and planning instructions of when, where, and how. Main outcome measure Test performance at 2 and 6 months following mailing of the test kit, retrieved from HMO's computerized database (2011-2012). Results Adherence in the experimental group ranged 1.2%-6.6% higher than in the control group. Within 6 months of kits' mailing, test uptake for the two waves was 71.4% and 67.9% for experiment and control, respectively (χ(2)=40.58, p=0.0001). The difference remained significant after controlling for age, gender, marital status, and wave (OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.11, 1.23, p Conclusions II technique is useful in increasing adherence to CRC screening, even in a mailed form rather than a face-to-face experimental situation. Mailed II is an inexpensive and effective method, applic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When an 'if-then' leaflet addressing common barriers and offering practical assistance was included with a CRC test kit, adherence in the experimental group was 1.2%-6.6% higher than in the control group, reaching 71.4% (vs. 67.9%) in the last six month wave.

    “When an 'if-then' leaflet addressing common barriers and offering practical assistance was included with a CRC test kit, adherence in the experimental group was 1.2%-6.6%higher than in the control group, reaching 71.4% (vs.67.9%) in the last six month wave [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neter, E., Stein, N., Barnett-Griness, O., Rennert, G., & Hagoel, L.
Affiliations
  • Ruppin Academic Center (IL)
  • Carmel Medical Center (IL)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Neter, Efrat
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
273-280
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043389697
Cited by
90
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
colorectal cancer screening, fecal occult blood test, screening adherence, implementation intentions, if-then planning, health behavior change, health maintenance organizations, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Aged, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Occult Blood, Patient Compliance, Postal Service, Public Health, Colorectal Neoplasms, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review