Cited by 11Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and InterventionsTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Criminal Behavior and Repeat Violent Trauma

Nanney, John T., Conrad, Erich J., McCloskey, Michael, Constans, Joseph I.·2015·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Repeat violent injury is common among young urban men and is increasingly a focus of trauma center-based injury prevention efforts. Though understanding risk factors for repeat violent injury may be critical in designing such interventions, this knowledge is limited. This study aims to determine which criminal behaviors, both before and after the initial trauma, predict repeat violent trauma. Gun, violent, and drug crimes are expected to increase risk of subsequent violent injury among victims of violence. Methods A case-control design examined trauma registry and publicly available criminal data for all male patients aged Results Regarding crimes committed before the first injury, only drug crime (OR=5.32) predicted repeat violent trauma. With respect to crimes committed after the initial injury, illegal gun possession (OR=2.70) predicted repeat victimization. Initiating gun (OR=3.53) or drug crime (OR=5.12) was associated with increased risk. Conclusions Prior drug involvement may identify young male victims of violence as at high risk of repeat violent injury. Gun carrying and initiating drug involvement after the initial injury may increase risk of repeat injury and may be important targets for interventions aimed at preventing repeat violent trauma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comprehensive and representative sample may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.

    “This may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.15,18,33-44”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 11

Authors
Nanney, J. T., Conrad, E. J., McCloskey, M., & Constans, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Nanney, John T.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
395-401
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997307015
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
criminal behavior, drug offenses, gun ownership, firearm carrying, gun violence, young men, risk factors, revictimization, urban violence
MeSH terms
Criminal Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Crime, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Urban Population, Violence, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Crime Victims, Young Adult, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review