Cited by 34Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and EducationGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Reach and Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program for Young Women

Ritchie, Natalie D., Sauder, Katherine A., Fabbri, Stefka·2017·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Reducing obesity and diabetes risks among women of child-bearing age is urgently needed to halt the transgenerational cycle of disease. Interventions among pregnant women have largely been ineffective and may be initiated too late to improve maternal and child health. The National Diabetes Prevention Program is a widely disseminated lifestyle intervention that may help mitigate risks before pregnancy. However, the program has targeted relatively older adults, and effectiveness among women of child-bearing age remains largely unknown. Methods The National Diabetes Prevention Program was delivered in an urban safety net hospital. Reach and effectiveness were evaluated among 4,866 eligible women who were invited to participate in the program. The authors compared enrollment, attendance, and weight loss for women aged 18-39 years as compared to women aged ≥40 years. Data were collected between 2013 and 2016. Analyses were conducted in 2017. Results Women of child-bearing age were nearly half as likely to enroll than older women in adjusted models (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.49, 0.69). Subsequently, younger enrollees were less likely to attend ≥1 session(s) than older women (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61, 0.99). There was no significant age group difference in program completion rates or weight-loss outcomes. Both groups lost an average of 3% body weight. Conclusions Women of child-bearing age were less likely than older women to engage in the National Diabetes Prevention Program; howe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritchie, N. D., Sauder, K. A., & Fabbri, S.
Affiliations
  • Denver Health Medical Center (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Ritchie, Natalie D.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
714-718
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755864636
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U58 DP004157)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
National Diabetes Prevention Program, women of child-bearing age, lifestyle intervention, diabetes prevention, obesity prevention, weight loss, program reach, program effectiveness, safety-net hospitals
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Life Style, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review