Reach and Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program for Young Women
Abstract
Introduction Reducing obesity and diabetes risks among women of child-bearing age is urgently needed to halt the transgenerational cycle of disease. Interventions among pregnant women have largely been ineffective and may be initiated too late to improve maternal and child health. The National Diabetes Prevention Program is a widely disseminated lifestyle intervention that may help mitigate risks before pregnancy. However, the program has targeted relatively older adults, and effectiveness among women of child-bearing age remains largely unknown. Methods The National Diabetes Prevention Program was delivered in an urban safety net hospital. Reach and effectiveness were evaluated among 4,866 eligible women who were invited to participate in the program. The authors compared enrollment, attendance, and weight loss for women aged 18-39 years as compared to women aged ≥40 years. Data were collected between 2013 and 2016. Analyses were conducted in 2017. Results Women of child-bearing age were nearly half as likely to enroll than older women in adjusted models (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.49, 0.69). Subsequently, younger enrollees were less likely to attend ≥1 session(s) than older women (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61, 0.99). There was no significant age group difference in program completion rates or weight-loss outcomes. Both groups lost an average of 3% body weight. Conclusions Women of child-bearing age were less likely than older women to engage in the National Diabetes Prevention Program; howe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High initial no-shows among enrollees overall are 25-60%, and appear higher for racial/ethnic minority, low-income, and younger participants.
“Another challenge is high initial “no shows” among enrollees overall (25–60%),21–23 which appear higher yet for racial/ethnic minority, low-income, and younger participants.”
From <p>Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011 · see citing works
Association of Intrauterine Exposure to Maternal Diabetes and Obesity With Type 2 Diabetes in Youth
Dabelea, D., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Lamichhane, A. P., D'Agostino, R. B., Liese, A. D., Vehik, K. S., Narayan, K. M. V., Zeitler, P., & Hamman, R. F. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-2417 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Catalano, P., & deMouzon, S. H. (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.15 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ritchie, N. D., Baucom, K. J., & Sauder, K. A. (2020) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dmso.s218334 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Specifically, Latino enrollees were half as likely to initially attend as compared to non-Hispanic white enrollees,(21) and women <40 years were about a quarter as likely to attend as their older counterparts (men were not included in this study).(22) Other data suggest lower show rates for Medicaid beneficiaries (69.”
BackgroundSelf-citationHarrison, C. R., Phimphasone-Brady, P., DiOrio, B., Raghuanath, S. G., Bright, R., Ritchie, N. D., & Sauder, K. A. (2020) · The Diabetes Educator · doi:10.1177/0145721720920252 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationChambers, E. C., Gonzalez, J. S., Marquez, M. E., Parsons, A., & Rehm, C. D. (2019) · The Diabetes Educator · doi:10.1177/0145721719880503 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ritchie, N. D., Sauder, K. A., & Fabbri, S.
- Affiliations
- Denver Health Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ritchie, Natalie D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 714-718
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2755864636
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U58 DP004157)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Keywords
- National Diabetes Prevention Program, women of child-bearing age, lifestyle intervention, diabetes prevention, obesity prevention, weight loss, program reach, program effectiveness, safety-net hospitals
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Life Style, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review