Cited by 81Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetes Among U.S. Adults: 1999–2016

Fang, Michael·2018·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction The prevalence of diabetes has increased substantially over the past three decades. This study sought to estimate recent trends in the prevalence of diabetes among U.S. adults.Methods This paper estimated trends in the prevalence of diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes among U.S. adults from 1999-2000 to 2015-2016 (analyzed in 2017). Data come from 42,554 respondents aged ≥20 years who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diagnosed diabetes was measured through self-report, undiagnosed diabetes was measured as never being diagnosed with diabetes but having glycated hemoglobin levels ≥6.5%, and total diabetes was measured as the sum of individuals with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes.Results In the overall U.S. adult population, the unadjusted prevalence of total diabetes increased from 7.7% in 1999-2000 to 13.3% in 2015-2016 (p<0.001 for trend). Growth was observed for all subgroups, though the rate of change was higher in older adults, racial minorities, and those who were obese compared with their peers. Increasing prevalence among Mexican-American adults was particularly pronounced, rising by 10.1 percentage points during the study period (8.3% to 18.4%, p<0.001). Roughly 40% of the increase in total diabetes was accounted for by changes in the age and rates of obesity in the U.S.Population Conclusions From 1999 to 2016, the prevalence of diabetes among U.S. adults increased at a substantial rate. This growth occurred differentially across subgroups, particularly impacting Mexican-American adults, and was driven in large part by population aging and increasing obesity rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 81

Authors
Fang, M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Michael
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
497-505
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886282582
Cited by
81
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
diabetes prevalence, temporal trends, undiagnosed diabetes, diagnosed diabetes, HbA1c, Mexican American adults, racial and ethnic disparities, obesity, population aging, older adults, racial minorities, United States adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Black or African American, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, United States, Prevalence, Mexican Americans, Black People, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review