Cited by 51Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Impact of Risk Stratification on Referrals and Uptake of Wraparound Services That Address Social Determinants: A Stepped Wedged Trial

Vest, Joshua R., Menachemi, Nir, Grannis, Shaun J., Ferrell, Jennifer L., Kasthurirathne, Suranga N., Zhang, Ying, Tong, Yan, Halverson, Paul K.·2019·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Social determinants of health are critical drivers of health status and cost, but are infrequently screened or addressed in primary care settings. Systematic approaches to identifying individuals with unmet social determinants needs could better support practice workflows and linkages of patients to services. A pilot study examined the effect of a risk-stratification tool on referrals to services that address social determinants in an urban safety-net population. Methods An intervention that risk stratified patients according to the need for wraparound was evaluated in a stepped wedge design (i.e., phased implementation at the clinic level during 2017). Staff at nine federally qualified health centers received a daily report predicting patients' needs for social worker, dietitian, behavioral health, and other wraparound services (categorized as low, rising, or high risk). Outcomes included referrals and uptake of appointments to wraparound services. Results Among 238,087 encounters, providing clinic staff with risk-stratification scores increased the odds that a patient would be referred to a social worker. For patients categorized as high risk, the odds of a social work referral was 65% higher than controls and similar patients, but lower effect sizes were observed for individuals categorized with rising and low risk. Among referred patients, the intervention was generally associated with increased odds of kept appointments. Conclusions This study provided preli…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vest, J. R., Menachemi, N., Grannis, S. J., Ferrell, J. L., Kasthurirathne, S. N., Zhang, Y., Tong, Y., & Halverson, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Eskenazi Health (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Vest, Joshua R.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
e125-e133
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911602402
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
social determinants of health, risk stratification, wraparound services, social work referral, referral uptake, primary care, federally qualified health centers, appointment adherence, behavioral health services, low-income urban communities
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Indiana, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Preventive Health Services, Referral and Consultation, Social Work, Risk Assessment, Urban Health Services, Safety-net Providers, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review