Impact of Risk Stratification on Referrals and Uptake of Wraparound Services That Address Social Determinants: A Stepped Wedged Trial
Abstract
Introduction Social determinants of health are critical drivers of health status and cost, but are infrequently screened or addressed in primary care settings. Systematic approaches to identifying individuals with unmet social determinants needs could better support practice workflows and linkages of patients to services. A pilot study examined the effect of a risk-stratification tool on referrals to services that address social determinants in an urban safety-net population. Methods An intervention that risk stratified patients according to the need for wraparound was evaluated in a stepped wedge design (i.e., phased implementation at the clinic level during 2017). Staff at nine federally qualified health centers received a daily report predicting patients' needs for social worker, dietitian, behavioral health, and other wraparound services (categorized as low, rising, or high risk). Outcomes included referrals and uptake of appointments to wraparound services. Results Among 238,087 encounters, providing clinic staff with risk-stratification scores increased the odds that a patient would be referred to a social worker. For patients categorized as high risk, the odds of a social work referral was 65% higher than controls and similar patients, but lower effect sizes were observed for individuals categorized with rising and low risk. Among referred patients, the intervention was generally associated with increased odds of kept appointments. Conclusions This study provided preli…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systematic screening and documentation of health determinants can directly impact patient care and research efforts.
“Systematic screening and documentation of health determinants can directly impact patient care [1–8] and research efforts [1,5].”
Cites
The Social Determinants of Health: Coming of Age
Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218 · Cited by 2,476 · see citing works
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
Hemming, K., Haines, T. P., Chilton, P. J., Girling, A. J., & Lilford, R. J. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h391 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
Addressing Social Determinants of Health at Well Child Care Visits: A Cluster RCT
Garg, A., Toy, S., Tripodis, Y., Silverstein, M., & Freeman, E. (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2888 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Gold, R., Cottrell, E., Bunce, A., Middendorf, M., Hollombe, C., Cowburn, S., Mahr, P., & Melgar, G. (2017) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170046 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Page-Reeves, J., Kaufman, W., Bleecker, M., Norris, J., McCalmont, K., Ianakieva, V., Ianakieva, D., & Kaufman, A. (2016) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150272 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Kasthurirathne, S. N., Vest, J. R., Menachemi, N., Halverson, P. K., & Grannis, S. J. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx130 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Screening for Social Determinants of Health: The Known and Unknown
Davidson, K. W., & McGinn, T. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.10915 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Sood, N., Stetter, C., Kunselman, A., & Jasani, S. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000428 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vest, J. R., Menachemi, N., Grannis, S. J., Ferrell, J. L., Kasthurirathne, S. N., Zhang, Y., Tong, Y., & Halverson, P. K.
- Affiliations
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- Eskenazi Health (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vest, Joshua R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e125-e133
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911602402
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Keywords
- social determinants of health, risk stratification, wraparound services, social work referral, referral uptake, primary care, federally qualified health centers, appointment adherence, behavioral health services, low-income urban communities
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Indiana, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Preventive Health Services, Referral and Consultation, Social Work, Risk Assessment, Urban Health Services, Safety-net Providers, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review