Variation in Electronic Health Record Documentation of Social Determinants of Health Across a National Network of Community Health Centers
Open accessAbstract
Introduction This paper describes the adoption of an electronic health record-based social determinants of health screening tool in a national network of more than 100 community health centers. Methods In 2016, a screening tool with questions on 7 social determinants of health domains was developed and deployed in the electronic health record, with technical instructions on how to use the tool and suggested clinical workflows. To understand adoption patterns, the study team extracted electronic health record data for any patient with a community health center visit between June 2016 and May 2018. Patients were considered "screened" if a response to at least 1 social determinants of health domain was documented in the electronic health record tool. Results A total of 31,549 patients (2% of those with a visit in the study period) had a documented social determinants of health screening. The number of screenings increased over time, time; 71 community health centers (67%) conducted at least one screening, but almost 50% took place in only 4 community health centers. Over half (55%) of screenings only included responses for only 1 domain. Screening was most likely to occur during an office visit with an established patient and documented in the electronic health record by a medical assistant. Conclusions Screening documentation patterns varied widely across the network of community health centers. Despite the growing national emphasis on the importance of screening for social det…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two of the articles mentioned the potential for bias, in both cases due to data missing nonrandomly.
“Two of the articles mentioned the potential for bias, in both cases due to data missing nonrandomly.6,59”
From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
Systematic screening and documentation of health determinants can directly impact patient care and research efforts.
“Systematic screening and documentation of health determinants can directly impact patient care [1–8] and research efforts [1,5].”
Lacking is an established standardized set of determinants or method of capture to inform care delivery and optimization efforts.
“Lacking is an established standardized set of determinants or method of capture [5,13,14,19] to inform care delivery and optimization efforts.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Cottrell, E. K., Dambrun, K., Cowburn, S., Mossman, N., Bunce, A. E., Marino, M., Krancari, M., & Gold, R.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Ochin (US)
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cottrell, Erika K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- S65-S73
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990947921
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R18DK114701\u201301)
- Kaiser Permanente (CRN5374-7544-15320)
- Congressional Hunger Center
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (75922)
- Honeywell Hometown Solutions (1R13HS026664)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- social determinants of health, social needs screening, electronic health record tools, community health centers, medical assistants, clinical workflow
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Community Health Centers, Documentation, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, United States, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review